A design process for using normative models in shared decision making: a case study in the context of prenatal testing

Rapaport, Sivan; Leshno, Moshe; Fink, Lior

doi:10.1111/hex.12004

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 36 publications

(58 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The objective of the SDM process is to find the best treatment for a specific patient by encouraging the patient to play a more active role in the process of medical consultation [1]. Thus, eliciting patient preferences is a vital component of SDM [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving the Process of Shared Decision-Making by Integrating Online Structured Information and Self-Assessment Tools

Hsu

Kuo

et al. 2022

JPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The integration of face-to-face communication and online processes to provide access to information and self-assessment tools may improve shared decision-making (SDM) processes. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of implementing an online SDM process with topics and content developed through a participatory design approach. We analyzed the triggered and completed SDM cases with responses from participants at a medical center in Taiwan. Data were retrieved from the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database of the hospital for analysis. Each team developed web-based patient decision aids (PDA) with empirical evidence in a multi-digitized manner, allowing patients to scan QR codes on a leaflet using their mobile phones and then read the PDA content online. From July 2019 to December 2020, 48 web-based SDM topics were implemented in the 24 clinical departments of this hospital. The results showed that using the REDCap system improved SDM efficiency and quality. Implementing an online SDM process integrated with face-to-face communication enhanced the practice and effectiveness of SDM, possibly through the flexibility of accessing information, self-assessment, and feedback evaluation.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving the Process of Shared Decision-Making by Integrating Online Structured Information and Self-Assessment Tools

Hsu

Kuo

et al. 2022

JPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Patient advocacy and shared decision making (i.e., collaborative decision making that balances the provider’s expert knowledge with the patient’s right to be fully informed) have been promoted in health care settings when health care decisions are being made (Padgett et al, 2014; Rapaport, Leshno, & Fink, 2014; Segal & Shahar, 2009). By contrast, this study revealed that the participants seemed to readily accept obstetricians’ recommendations for undergoing amniocentesis, and their spouses agreed to the wives’ decisions without objections.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%