2016
DOI: 10.3127/ajis.v20i0.1329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Design Science Research Methodology for Expert Systems Development

Abstract: The knowledge of design science research (DSR) can have applications for improving expert systems (ES) development research. Although significant progress of utilising DSR has been observed in particular information systems design -such as decision support systems (DSS) studies -only rare attempts can be found in the ES design literature. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the use of DSR for ES design. First, we explore the ES development literature to reveal the presence of DSR as a research m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Knowledge that is directly relevant to artefact design is one of the outputs of design science research (DSR) and has an important application in improving DSS design research (Miah & Gammack, 2014;Miah & Genemo, 2016;Genemo, Miah & McAndrew, 2015;Miah, 2009). Although, several studies have been introduced for methods of constructing and evaluating artefacts (Hevner et al, 2004;Iivari, 2015;Orlikowski & Iacono, 2001;Miah 2008;Peffers, 2008); design theory (Gregor & Hevner, 2013;Iivari, 2015) , a very few attempts are made on contributing to the development of artefact design knowledge such as the key activities, ground rules and processes that may construct the artefact itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge that is directly relevant to artefact design is one of the outputs of design science research (DSR) and has an important application in improving DSS design research (Miah & Gammack, 2014;Miah & Genemo, 2016;Genemo, Miah & McAndrew, 2015;Miah, 2009). Although, several studies have been introduced for methods of constructing and evaluating artefacts (Hevner et al, 2004;Iivari, 2015;Orlikowski & Iacono, 2001;Miah 2008;Peffers, 2008); design theory (Gregor & Hevner, 2013;Iivari, 2015) , a very few attempts are made on contributing to the development of artefact design knowledge such as the key activities, ground rules and processes that may construct the artefact itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interview structure and predeveloped themes were also prepared based on the literature review which was sent to the participant prior to the interview (Table 4). Thematic analysis has been used widely in qualitative research and it can be used across a range of epistemology and research questions (King, 2004;Miah & Genemo, 2016). While there is no clear agreement about how rigorous a thematic analysis is, King (2004), suggested that direct quotes from participants to be embedded within the analytic narratives support the validity of the identified themes and merit of the analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, no attention is paid to the management of knowledge systems. In [11], a general methodology for constructing expert systems is presented, but there is no specification of approaches to the implementation of the metaknowledge model. Methods of presenting information about processes under uncertainty are considered in [12], but this information is not updated in the form of metarules.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%