“…A good example is the (6,4)@(12,8) nanotube, where we predict a RBM frequency of 346.5 cm −1 as opposed to 339 cm −1 from previous works. 21,44 Further examples that we assigned differently are (6,4) @(11,10), (6,4)@(13,8), and (6,4)@(14,8). In the weakcoupling regime both models seem to deliver similar results; however, the underlying model of Pfeiffer et al 21,28 is not compatible with the optical energy shifts.…”