2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8bb2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Detailed Comparison of Multidimensional Boltzmann Neutrino Transport Methods in Core-collapse Supernovae

Abstract: The mechanism driving core-collapse supernovae is sensitive to the interplay between matter and neutrino radiation. However, neutrino radiation transport is very difficult to simulate, and several radiation transport methods of varying levels of approximation are available. We carefully compare for the first time in multiple spatial dimensions the discrete ordinates (DO) code of Nagakura, Yamada, and Sumiyoshi and the Monte Carlo (MC) code Sedonu, under the assumptions of a static fluid background, flat spacet… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
109
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
(181 reference statements)
7
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The details of the code development of our Boltzmann solver are described in a series of papers Nagakura et al 2014Nagakura et al , 2017Nagakura et al , 2019d and its reliability has been well established by a detailed comparison to another Monte-Carlo neutrino transport code (Richers et al 2017). Some results of axisymmetric CCSN simulations by using our code can be seen in Nagakura et al (2018); Harada et al (2019); Nagakura et al (2019c).…”
Section: Ccsn Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The details of the code development of our Boltzmann solver are described in a series of papers Nagakura et al 2014Nagakura et al , 2017Nagakura et al , 2019d and its reliability has been well established by a detailed comparison to another Monte-Carlo neutrino transport code (Richers et al 2017). Some results of axisymmetric CCSN simulations by using our code can be seen in Nagakura et al (2018); Harada et al (2019); Nagakura et al (2019c).…”
Section: Ccsn Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This generates coherent lateral flux of ELN, and then induces the non-radial ELN crossings. It should be noted, however, that our Boltzmann solver suffers from the numerical diffusion in particular at larger radii as demonstrated in Richers et al (2017), which may artificially enhance the region of non-radial ELN crossing. For more quantitative discussions, we need to carry out higher-resolution simulations, which are beyond the scope of this paper, though.…”
Section: Role Of Asymmetric ν Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We solve the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity using the mass integration method. Details of the formulation and numerical methods in our code were presented in a series of our previous papers (Sumiyoshi & Yamada 2012;Nagakura et al 2014;Shibata et al 2014;Nagakura et al 2017) and the reliability of our code was established by a detailed comparison with Monte-Carlo transport method in Richers et al (2017a). For all simulations, we employ the same weak interaction rates as those used in (Nagakura et al 2018), except for electron and positron captures on nuclei.…”
Section: Electron and Positron Capturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulations have become the primary tool for studying the nonlinear and multi-physics dynamics in CCSNe. Current state of the art simulations account for neutrino transport by treating neutrinos as classical radiation and employing a variety of implementations of the relativistic Boltzmann equation or approximations thereof (e.g., [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]). Over the years since the first numerical model of a neutrino-driven supernova by ?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%