2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3800(00)00260-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A detailed ecosystem model of phosphorus dynamics in created riparian wetlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang and Mitsch (2000) verified that TP inflow concentration and phosphorus sedimentation coefficient (sed k in our model) were the most sensitive parameters explaining TP retention in a dynamic phosphorus model of created wetlands. Therefore, we carried out sensitivity analysis of TP inflow concentration and the sedimentation coefficient (sed k) on corresponding changes of TP retention (%) in our model runs with the LCW.…”
Section: Simulation Methodssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Wang and Mitsch (2000) verified that TP inflow concentration and phosphorus sedimentation coefficient (sed k in our model) were the most sensitive parameters explaining TP retention in a dynamic phosphorus model of created wetlands. Therefore, we carried out sensitivity analysis of TP inflow concentration and the sedimentation coefficient (sed k) on corresponding changes of TP retention (%) in our model runs with the LCW.…”
Section: Simulation Methodssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Calibration was carried out by adjusting selected parameters in the model to obtain a best fit between model estimations and field data from ORW 1 for TP retention. A stepwise method (Mitsch and Reeder, 1991;and Wang and Mitsch, 2000) was used in this process by first calibrating the hydrology submodel, then macrophyte submodel, phosphorus submodel, and finally economic model. At each step, values of parameters determined during the previous step were not allowed to change from previously calibrated values.…”
Section: Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations