2023
DOI: 10.1002/jaba.1015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A detailed examination of reporting procedural fidelity in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Abstract: Few reviews on procedural fidelity—the degree to which procedures are implemented as designed—provide details to gauge the quality of fidelity reporting in behavior‐analytic research. This review focused on experiments in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (2006–2021) with “integrity” or “fidelity” in the abstract or body. When fidelity data were collected, the coders characterized measurement details (e.g., description of calculation, report of single or multiple values, frequency of fidelity checks, ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
(119 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To identify potential participants, we used a list that contained the names of scholars who had published at least one paper in JABA as the corresponding author from 2006–2020 ( N = 435) and the frequency with which those individuals reported fidelity data in their JABA publications. The list was created as part of another project that examined the frequency of fidelity reporting in JABA (Bergmann et al, 2022). We cross‐referenced this list with individuals who were currently serving on JABA 's editorial board or who were serving or had served as associate editors or editors‐in‐chief for JABA or other major behavioral journals and added information about their current position (title and geographical location) and primary areas of interest (e.g., problem behavior, skill acquisition, feeding).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify potential participants, we used a list that contained the names of scholars who had published at least one paper in JABA as the corresponding author from 2006–2020 ( N = 435) and the frequency with which those individuals reported fidelity data in their JABA publications. The list was created as part of another project that examined the frequency of fidelity reporting in JABA (Bergmann et al, 2022). We cross‐referenced this list with individuals who were currently serving on JABA 's editorial board or who were serving or had served as associate editors or editors‐in‐chief for JABA or other major behavioral journals and added information about their current position (title and geographical location) and primary areas of interest (e.g., problem behavior, skill acquisition, feeding).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%