2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.01.162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A detailed look beneath the surface: Evidence of a surface reconstruction beneath a capping layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the c(8 × 2) surface component at 215.1 eV vanishes, a lift of the Ga-rich surface reconstruction is suggested, again. This is different from the results obtained for the Fe/GaAs(0 0 1) layer system, where Fe preserves the GaAs(0 0 1) surface reconstruction [51]. In the case of Co deposition on GaAs, the surface reconstruction is lifted due to a strong interaction between Co and Ga.…”
Section: Co(bcc)/gaas(0 0 1) Interfacecontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the c(8 × 2) surface component at 215.1 eV vanishes, a lift of the Ga-rich surface reconstruction is suggested, again. This is different from the results obtained for the Fe/GaAs(0 0 1) layer system, where Fe preserves the GaAs(0 0 1) surface reconstruction [51]. In the case of Co deposition on GaAs, the surface reconstruction is lifted due to a strong interaction between Co and Ga.…”
Section: Co(bcc)/gaas(0 0 1) Interfacecontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…Compared to the pure Ga 3d signal (blue line), both new components are shifted to higher kinetic energies by roughly 0.8 eV. According to literature, the pure Ga 3d signal contains three components, referring to two surface states and one bulk state since GaAs c(8 × 2) is a Ga-rich surface reconstruction [45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. The bulk state at 236.5 eV is no longer detectable, since it is buried beneath the Co layer.…”
Section: Co(bcc)/gaas(0 0 1) Interfacementioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation