2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14174161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Detection Approach for Floating Debris Using Ground Images Based on Deep Learning

Abstract: Floating debris has a negative impact on the quality of the water as well as the aesthetics of surface waters. Traditional image processing techniques struggle to adapt to the complexity of water due to factors such as complex lighting conditions, significant scale disparities between far and near objects, and the abundance of small-scale floating debris in real existence. This makes the detection of floating debris extremely difficult. This study proposed a brand-new, effective floating debris detection appro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The acquired image was taken in an orthogonal view, which is optimal for minimizing distortions caused by the perspective effect. However, studies (e.g., [33,34,[48][49][50]) indicate that this is not a necessary condition, and it is possible to obtain reliable results without orthorectification. Utilizing cameras permanently installed in the technical infrastructure of a facility is possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acquired image was taken in an orthogonal view, which is optimal for minimizing distortions caused by the perspective effect. However, studies (e.g., [33,34,[48][49][50]) indicate that this is not a necessary condition, and it is possible to obtain reliable results without orthorectification. Utilizing cameras permanently installed in the technical infrastructure of a facility is possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conduct experiments to evaluate the detection accuracy and speed of YOLOv5-FF by comparing YOLOv5-FF with several important object detection solutions including the two lightest versions of YOLOv8 [32], i.e., YOLOv8n and YOLOv8s, YOLOv7 [33], YOLOv5 [26], YOLOX [34], YOLOv4 [35], YOLOv3 [36], SSD [37], Faster-RCNN [38] and YOLOv5-CB [39]. Faster-RCNN is a two-stage detection solution, while all the other solutions are single-stage detection solutions.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in the classification recognition stage, traditional image processing employs Support Vector Machines (SVM) or clustering methods to classify and recognize the extracted features, thereby accomplishing tasks such as detection, recognition, and tracking of the target [6], [7], [40]. However, traditional classifiers are typically based on artificial features and shallow models, making them less capable of handling complex image features and scenarios, and they often yield unsatisfactory results when dealing with non-linear problems [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%