2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A developmental approach to the risk of a first recurrence in child protective services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the covariates, younger age was related to a higher risk of a maltreatment report that is compatible with other studies [ 6 , 9 , 15 , 41 ]. The other variables, such as economic status, complicated family structure, or family size, are not associated with outcome significantly in bivariate analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the covariates, younger age was related to a higher risk of a maltreatment report that is compatible with other studies [ 6 , 9 , 15 , 41 ]. The other variables, such as economic status, complicated family structure, or family size, are not associated with outcome significantly in bivariate analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Numerous studies have identified risk factors for cause of child maltreatment at multiple levels applying ecological-transactional model [ 2 ]. At ontogenic level, parent factors include mental health [ 3 ] and substance abuse [ 4 , 5 ]; at microsystemic level, child factors include younger age [ 3 , 6 , 7 ], disability [ 8 ], and behavior problems [ 6 , 9 , 10 ] and family factors include being from a single-parent or step-parent family [ 3 , 6 , 7 ], experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) and conflict [ 5 , 8 , 11 ]; at exosystemic level, community factors include poverty [ 3 , 5 , 10 ] and isolation [ 8 , 12 14 ]. Additionally, for maltreatment recurrence, the characteristics of the incidence (e.g., types or number of previous episodes of maltreatment) [ 6 , 15 ], the CPS intervention [ 3 , 6 , 11 ], and post-investigation services [ 3 , 6 , 10 , 15 – 17 ] also contribute.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infants and younger children (ages 0–3 years) were also more commonly referred to income, food, and housing support services (e.g., social assistance, food bank, and shelter services) than older children. The importance of adopting a differential approach to child welfare policy, practice, and research that considers child age has been forwarded and is supported by the findings of this study [ 61 ]. Ontario has not yet implemented wide-scale programs with respect to differential response options [ 16 , 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…These landmark Canadian studies have identified age-specific factors associated with the timing of placement, for whom placement, placement changes, and family reunification are most likely to occur in the province [ 32 , 33 , 34 ]. There are also numerous examples in the extant literature that highlight the promise of using administrative data to explore recurrence (e.g., [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]). Studies conducted in Quebec, Canada by Hélie and colleagues [ 36 , 40 ] are also notable examples.…”
Section: Ontario Child Welfare: the Data Practice And Policy Landmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also numerous examples in the extant literature that highlight the promise of using administrative data to explore recurrence (e.g., [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]). Studies conducted in Quebec, Canada by Hélie and colleagues [ 36 , 40 ] are also notable examples.…”
Section: Ontario Child Welfare: the Data Practice And Policy Landmentioning
confidence: 99%