1966
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A DEVICE FOR THE PARTIAL RESTRAINT OF RATS IN OPERANT CONDITIONING STUDIES1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A "stock" was added to the restrainer described by Hall, Clayton, and Mark (1966) to prevent grooming, since movements of the forepaws across the face added greatly to the noise in the photodiode signal. Rats were adapted to the restrainer for various periods, but never less than a week, before data were collected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A "stock" was added to the restrainer described by Hall, Clayton, and Mark (1966) to prevent grooming, since movements of the forepaws across the face added greatly to the noise in the photodiode signal. Rats were adapted to the restrainer for various periods, but never less than a week, before data were collected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The animal's eyes would always be oriented toward the display, maximizing the detection of visual stimuli. This restraint may also prove beneficial in situations in which general limitations on movement are necessary, such as physiological studies in which excessive activity could interfere with physiological recording (Hall et al, 1966).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of their potential advantages, these devices appear to be have been used limitedly, in studies of aversive control (e.g., Azrin, Hopwood, & Powell, 1967;Dallemagne & Richelle, 1970) and in studies involving physiological recording (Hall et al, 1966). One can only speculate that problems of adapting animals to restraining systems, daily placement in and removal from the restraint, concerns that restraint systems would induce stress, and lack of a commercially available restraint system have been major factors in selection of the operant chamber over a restraining device.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surface electrodes have been used with rats, for example, for recording physiological reactions (Ferraro, Silver, and Snapper, 1965) and licking responses (DeBold, Miller, and Jensen, 1965), as well as for delivering shock as a punisher (Bijou, 1942) and as the unconditioned stimuli in the conditioned suppression procedure (Hall, Clayton, and Mark, 1966). Since the rat will remove a surface electrode that delivers aversive shock, DeBold et al (1965) and Bijou (1942) physically restrained the rat to prevent it from removing the electrodes; but, as Bijou found for one of his restraining devices, "Holder A", excessive restraint interfered with operant responding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%