A DfX-based approach for incorporating sustainability in infrastructure project planning

Abstract

PurposeThis paper investigates how the “Design for Sustainability” mindset of the manufacturing sector can be effectively transferred in the context of construction and proposes appropriate implementation tools for the promotion of sustainability in infrastructure projects' planning and design.Design/methodology/approachThe Design for Excellence (DfX) approach is first investigated in the context of manufacturing through the review of related literature, and the goals of Design for Sustainability (DfS), in particular, are specified. The suggestions of the literature are used as a basis for the development of the conceptually equivalent goals in the context of infrastructure projects and to highlight the construction management strategies which qualify as potential DfS tools.FindingsThis paper presents how well-known construction planning and management methods, techniques or strategies such as cost–benefit analysis, sustainability-driven procurement, contractors' involvement in design, value-based design, building information modeling (BIM) and buildability review enable the holistic promotion of the triple bottom line in feasibility, design and procurement of infrastructure projects, when combined in the context of an integrated planning approach.Originality/valueThe DfX mindset has very limited presence in the construction literature. This paper attempts to conceptualize its scope in the context of infrastructure projects while putting the multidimensional concept of sustainability as primary planning and design consideration. The proposed planning approach and the systematic mapping of the respective implementation tools can facilitate the decision-makers to achieve the desired sustainability benefits, in line with their priorities.

Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Robotic Manufacturing Technological Interoperability in Construction – A Cyclic Systematic Literature Review

“…The keywords co-occurrence network shows that BIM shares an extensive technological body of research with OSC. In these studies, BIM is often used in Design for X (DfX) [88,89], especially in Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DfMA) [90][91][92]. Indeed, these design processes are supported by the standardization and collaborative technological workflows provided by BIM tools.…”

Assessment of Barriers and Strategies for the Enhancement of Off-Site Construction in India: An ISM Approach

“…It also allows for the development of reliable early cost predictions [20,21], facilitates construction and helps avoid unnecessary complexity and errors [22,23]. The use of OSC and of related design principles have been extensively discussed in relation to a variety of well-known sustainability-promoting practices such as value management, buildability, waste minimization and lean construction [6,8,24,25]. The biggest advantages of OSC compared with traditional construction are thought to be the decreased construction time on site, increased quality and elimination of defects [26].…”

Design for manufacture and assembly (DfMA) in architectural design meetings: from a case study to knowledge-to-action framework

“…DfMA is originated in the manufacturing industry and has expanded to the umbrella of design for excellence (DfX), where “X” or “excellence” can be reinterpreted differently, such as design for reliability (DfR), design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) and design for disassembly (DfD) (Marinelli, 2021). It breaks down barriers among stakeholders, improves buildability, prevents errors and reworks, escalates productivity and unlocks the full potential of design, production and assembly (Boothroyd, 1994).…”