The repulsion between free electrons inside a metal makes its optical response spatially dispersive, so that it is not described by Drude's model but by a hydrodynamic model. We give here fully analytic results for a metallic slab in this framework, thanks to a two-modes cavity formalism leading to a Fabry-Perot formula, and show that a simplification can be made that preserves the accuracy of the results while allowing much simpler analytic expressions. For metallic layers thicker than 2.7 nm modified Fresnel coefficients can actually be used to accurately predict the response of any multilayer with spatially dispersive metals (for reflection, transmission or the guided modes). Finally, this explains why adding a small dielectric layer [Y. Luo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 093901 (2013)] allows to reproduce the effects of nonlocality in many cases, and especially for multilayers. Drude's model, where the electromagnetic response of metals is summarized in a local permittivity, has been very successful in describing the optical response of metals even at the scale of a few nanometers. Electrons are however repulsing each other, making the response of metals spatially dispersive -a phenomenon that is completely overlooked in Drude's model. The response is then said to be non-local because the metal can not be described by a simple permittivity any more. This subject has attracted a lot of interest from a theoretical point of view in the seventies and eighties[1, 2], but an experimental evidence that the Drude model could be inaccurate even in the optical domain has been produced only very recently for very narrow gaps between two metals [3,4]. The hydrodynamic model with hard-wall boundaries[5-7] is a sufficiently accurate framework to take these nonlocal effects into account -even if more complex models taking spill-out corrections have very rencently been proposed [8]. It appears now that nonlocal effects have an impact on metallo-dielectric multilayers with deeply subwavelength thicknesses of dielectric or metal[9] for instance when guided modes are supported [6,10] or when trying to design all kinds of plasmonic flat lenses [11][12][13]. The hydrodynamic model is particularly interesting in the framework of multilayers because the fields have analytic expressions in that case [6,10,12,14,15]. Taking nonlocality into account can be complicated for more complex structures, and there is clearly a need for simpler approaches: it has been recently shown [16], spurring debate [17,18], that adding a very thin dielectric layer could yield results that match very well with the prediction of the hydrodynamic model.In the present work, we first obtain simple analytic expressions using a generalized cavity formalism for a single metallic slab. We then show that a simple assumption, which is valid as soon as the metallic layer is thicker than 2.7 nm in the visible range and 5-6 nm in the near UV, can greatly reduce the complexity of the calculus of the nonlocal response. Using our assumption, simpler * antoine.moreau@uca....