2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A DGTD method for the numerical modeling of the interaction of light with nanometer scale metallic structures taking into account non-local dispersion effects

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The solution across elements is discontinuous, and continuity of the flux is enforced weakly across element interfaces. The DG method with explicit time integration was applied to solve the time-domain Maxwell's equations [27], and has been further developed to simulate wave propagation phenomena through metamaterials at the nanoscale [11], as well as for dispersive media [31,35,37] and more recently for 2D dimers using the hydrodynamic model [59]. DG methods face disadvantages when used for practical 3D applications in the frequency domain or in the time domain with implicit time integration, due to the computational burden that arises from nodal duplication at the interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution across elements is discontinuous, and continuity of the flux is enforced weakly across element interfaces. The DG method with explicit time integration was applied to solve the time-domain Maxwell's equations [27], and has been further developed to simulate wave propagation phenomena through metamaterials at the nanoscale [11], as well as for dispersive media [31,35,37] and more recently for 2D dimers using the hydrodynamic model [59]. DG methods face disadvantages when used for practical 3D applications in the frequency domain or in the time domain with implicit time integration, due to the computational burden that arises from nodal duplication at the interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to earlier works [6,7], timedomain approaches provide direct access to the nonlinear properties of the hydrodynamic Drude model by solving the full set of nonlinear equations [17,18,21], without making any further assumptions about the nonlinear source terms. In particular, the Discontinuous Galerkin Time-Domain (DGTD) method [22], a time-dependent finite-element framework, has shown good performance characteristics both for nonlocal and nonlinear properties [17,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hope this work will help the community to assess much more easily the influence of nonlocality on the response of metallic structures with nanometer-sized features -especially in cases that are both numerically expensive and the most likely to be influenced by spatial dispersion [6], like the computation of the Purcell effect [32,33] when emitters are placed under an optical patch antenna [34]. Our study actually suggests that, when using advanced simulation tools for complicated geometries [35,36], it is not necessary to use the hydrodynamic model to describe the response of the metal beyond a boundary layer of 2.7 nm in the visible. This is likely to make such simulations less expensive, an obvious need [16] of the community.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%