1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf01183847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A diagnostic caution in screening for depressed college students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These procedures conformed to those suggested by Deardorff and Funabiki (1985) to ensure stability in depressed groups. They also served as a safeguard for the nondepressed subjects who would undergo induction procedures.…”
Section: Subjects and Designmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…These procedures conformed to those suggested by Deardorff and Funabiki (1985) to ensure stability in depressed groups. They also served as a safeguard for the nondepressed subjects who would undergo induction procedures.…”
Section: Subjects and Designmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Future research is needed to determine ideal cut scores for the BDI-II for identifying clinical depression (i.e., "case detection"), as research with the BDI has shown that not all individuals with elevated scores meet diagnostic criteria for major depression in students (e.g., Deardorff & Funabiki, 1985) or community samples (e.g., Oliver & Simmons, 1984). However, given that the BDI-II was constructed to measure more closely the DSM-IV symptoms of major depressive episode, it may be that the scale will be a more sensitive measure than was its predecessor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, caution should be used in the interpretation of set points to determine levels of depression symptoms. Deardorf and Funabiki [11] and Hammen [12] acknowledge the difficulty in establishing universal set points to determine different degrees of depression. A better understanding of changes in depression symptoms may occur when measured changes are compared with changes in other constructs of interest [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%