2022
DOI: 10.1111/ene.15296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A diagnostic score for anti‐myelin‐associated‐glycoprotein neuropathy or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in patients with anti‐myelin‐associated‐glycoprotein antibody

Abstract: Background and purpose:A diagnostic score was developed to discriminate anti-myelinassociated-glycoprotein (MAG) neuropathy from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and applied it to patients with atypical anti-MAG neuropathy. Methods:The clinical and electrophysiological features of patients with a diagnosis of typical anti-MAG neuropathy were compared to those of patients with a diagnosis of CIDP. The association of each feature with the diagnosis was assessed in the two groups.F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distal conduction distances were 60, 80, and 85 mm for the median and ulnar, peroneal, and tibial nerves, respectively. 42 The average distal CMAP amplitude (average CMAP) was defined as the arithmetic mean of CMAP amplitudes among the four motor nerves (median, ulnar, tibial, and peroneal). All parameters except for TLI were converted to percentage values relative to their respective normal limits to adjust for minor differences between the inference ranges of the participating centers ( Supplementary Table 1 in the online-only Data Supplement).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distal conduction distances were 60, 80, and 85 mm for the median and ulnar, peroneal, and tibial nerves, respectively. 42 The average distal CMAP amplitude (average CMAP) was defined as the arithmetic mean of CMAP amplitudes among the four motor nerves (median, ulnar, tibial, and peroneal). All parameters except for TLI were converted to percentage values relative to their respective normal limits to adjust for minor differences between the inference ranges of the participating centers ( Supplementary Table 1 in the online-only Data Supplement).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 14 , 15 All the patients had neurophysiologic evidence of distal acquired demyelinating symmetric neuropathy with low conduction velocities and markedly prolonged distal latencies and no conduction blocks. Patients with atypical forms of anti-MAG antibody neuropathy 16 were not included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When CIDP with high anti‐MAG antibody titers was classified by the cutoff, there was no difference in the response to IVIg between the CIDP with high anti‐MAG antibody titers patients classified as CIDP by the score and the patients with definite typical CIDP. This score might assist in proper treatment, especially IVIg, being chosen for patients with anti‐MAG antibodies with a CIDP‐like presentation 37 …”
Section: Igm‐type Panmentioning
confidence: 99%