2017
DOI: 10.1112/jlms.12018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A diameter bound for finite simple groups of large rank

Abstract: Given a non-abelian finite simple group G of Lie type, and an arbitrary symmetric generating set S, it is conjectured by László Babai that its Cayley graph Γ(G, S) will have a diameter bound of (log |G|) O(1) . However, little progress has been made when the rank of G is large. In this article, we shall show that if G has rank n, and its base field has bounded size, then the diameter of Γ(G, S) would be bounded by exp (O(n(log n) 3 )).

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a linear algebraic analogue of the degree reduction lemma for permutations by Babai and Seress [, Lemma 3]. It improves the corresponding one by Biswas and Yang [, Lemma 4.4(ii)]. Theorem then follows by combining Lemma with the rest of the Biswas–Yang machinery.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is a linear algebraic analogue of the degree reduction lemma for permutations by Babai and Seress [, Lemma 3]. It improves the corresponding one by Biswas and Yang [, Lemma 4.4(ii)]. Theorem then follows by combining Lemma with the rest of the Biswas–Yang machinery.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Compare Lemma with [, Lemma 4.4(ii)]. The key difference is that Biswas and Yang required the primes to be coprime with p(q1), while we do not have such a restriction.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proof of part (iii) relies on [, Theorem 1.4], showing that, for G=Clnfalse(qfalse), the diameter d of any connected Cayley graph of G satisfies dqO(n(logn+logq)3).Combining this with the fact that the girth g of Γ(G,S) satisfies gB(k)n almost surely (see the remark following Theorem ), we easily derive part (iii).…”
Section: Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The diameter of Cayley graphs of finite simple groups (with explicit or with random generators) has also attracted considerable attention (see, for instance, and the references therein). Clearly if d and g are the diameter and girth, respectively, then a trivial lower bound for d is g2, and there is interest in finding families of graphs for which d is bounded in terms of g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%