2013
DOI: 10.1017/etds.2013.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dichotomy theorem for minimizers of monotone recurrence relations

Abstract: Variational monotone recurrence relations arise in solid state physics as generalizations of the Frenkel-Kontorova model for a ferromagnetic crystal. For such problems, Aubry-Mather theory establishes the existence of "ground states" or "global minimizers" of arbitrary rotation number. A nearest neighbor crystal model is equivalent to a Hamiltonian twist map. In this case, the global minimizers have a special property: they can only cross once. As a nontrivial consequence, every one of them has the Birkhoff … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We remark that the twist condition (H4) is weaker than that in [20] in that we require ∂ i,k h ≤ 0 while in [20] it is assumed that ∂ i,k h ≡ 0, for i = 1, k = 1, and i = k. So we cannot simply apply directly the conclusions of [20], especially the dichotomy theorem for minimizers. Nevertheless, inspired by the ideas of Mramor and Rink in [20,21] and Bangert in [5,6] (we even borrow most of the notation from [20]) we obtain the conclusion we need that a minimizer with bounded action is Birkhoff.…”
Section: Minimizers With Bounded Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We remark that the twist condition (H4) is weaker than that in [20] in that we require ∂ i,k h ≤ 0 while in [20] it is assumed that ∂ i,k h ≡ 0, for i = 1, k = 1, and i = k. So we cannot simply apply directly the conclusions of [20], especially the dichotomy theorem for minimizers. Nevertheless, inspired by the ideas of Mramor and Rink in [20,21] and Bangert in [5,6] (we even borrow most of the notation from [20]) we obtain the conclusion we need that a minimizer with bounded action is Birkhoff.…”
Section: Minimizers With Bounded Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, inspired by the ideas of Mramor and Rink in [20,21] and Bangert in [5,6] (we even borrow most of the notation from [20]) we obtain the conclusion we need that a minimizer with bounded action is Birkhoff. …”
Section: Minimizers With Bounded Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birkhoff minimizers or nonself-intersecting minimal solutions with any rotation vector have been constructed. However, as observed by Blank [1989], there exist minimizers that are not Birkhoff for high-dimensional lattice systems, see [Mramor & Rink, 2013] for such an example for the generalized FK model with non-nearest neighbor interactions. Similarly, for variational problems on a torus, there are minimal solutions with self-intersections, as remarked by Moser [1986].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, one needs new approaches to study the properties of minimizers or Birkhoff solutions [Mramor & Rink, 2012, 2013Wang & Qin, 2014a, 2014b. It was shown by Mramor and Rink [2013] that under some conditions, each minimizer is either Birkhoff, or it is oscillating and exponentially growing. We proved in [Guo et al, 2014] that this conclusion holds true even if we relax the strong twist condition in [Mramor & Rink, 2013].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation