6th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3358664.3358671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A diff procedure for music score files

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two visualization errors from both the Camera GrandStaff and Quartets dataset are shown in Figures 5 and 7, respectively. The highlighted errors were computed using the musicdiff tool [16] and visualized with the MuseScore editor 13 . Both examples show that, visually, the model is capable of generating a correct music sequence in terms of syntax, as no bar-completion or time-related errors are found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two visualization errors from both the Camera GrandStaff and Quartets dataset are shown in Figures 5 and 7, respectively. The highlighted errors were computed using the musicdiff tool [16] and visualized with the MuseScore editor 13 . Both examples show that, visually, the model is capable of generating a correct music sequence in terms of syntax, as no bar-completion or time-related errors are found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It consists of a tree-based decomposition of a music score that reflects its temporal organization. This draws heavily from [25][26][27], which introduced into the music information retrieval literature some ideas and tools from the fields of databases systems and computer linguistics (e.g., hierarchical decomposition of musical content and context-free grammars). Recently, the authors of [28] used a similar graph-based representation to study music similarity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases, the rhythmic decomposition rules can be expressed in a well-known formal language, namely Context-Free Grammars (CFG). In order to express decomposition preferences, they can be extended to Weighted Context-Free Grammars [26]. As an illustration, the following grammar G = (V, Mus, R, S) is sufficient to model the rhythmic organization of our example, with time signature 4/4.…”
Section: Music Content Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important drawback of this approach is that it depends on other aspects such as the usability of the notation editor utilized. Some authors calculate the edit distance between the expected encoding and the actual one [12]. However, if the encoding is based on an XML format, the actual effort to correct the output is not directly proportional to the edit distance obtained.…”
Section: Evaluation and Practical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%