A digital look at physical museum exhibits: Designing personalized stories with handheld Augmented Reality in museums

Keil, Jens; Pujol, Laia; Ρούσσου, Μαρία; Engelke, Timo; Schmitt, Michael; Bockholt, Ulrich; Eleftheratou, Stamatia

doi:10.1109/digitalheritage.2013.6744836

Cited by 84 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The studies of locationbased AR in history education focus instead on the development and usability of these systems (Ioannidis et al 2011;Katifori et al 2014;Keil et al 2013;Rabina and Cocciolo 2012;Vayanou et al 2012). The research designs of such studies rely primarily on selfreports of usability and preference (Cocciolo and Rabina 2013;Pujol et al 2013), qualitative field observations Rennick-Egglestone et al 2013), post-tour interviews (Cocciolo and Rabina 2013;Pujol et al 2013), and system generated log-file data (Vayanou et al 2012), from small sample sizes, which are used to inform changes made to the design of the interface.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing virtual and location-based augmented reality mobile learning: emotions and learning outcomes

Harley

Poitras

Jarrell

et al. 2016

Education Tech Research Dev

140

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research on the effectiveness of augmented reality (AR) on learning exists, but there is a paucity of empirical work that explores the role that positive emotions play in supporting learning in such settings. To address this gap, this study compared undergraduate students' emotions and learning outcomes during a guided historical tour using mobile AR applications. Data was collected in a laboratory (Study 1; N = 13) and outdoors (Study 2; N = 18) from thirty-one undergraduate students at a large North American university. Our findings demonstrated that learners were able to effectively and enjoyably learn about historical differences between past and present historical locations by contextualizing their visual representations, and that the two mobile AR apps were effective both in and outside of the laboratory. Learners were virtually situated in the historical location in Study 1 and physically visited the location in Study 2. In comparing results -015-9420-7 between studies, findings revealed that learners were able to identify more differences outdoors and required less scaffolding to identify differences. Learners reported high levels of enjoyment throughout both studies, but more enjoyment and less boredom in the outdoor study. Eye tracking results from Study 1 indicated that learners frequently compared historical information by switching their gaze between mobile devices and a Smart Board, which virtually situated them at the historical location. Results enhance our understanding of AR applications' effectiveness in different contexts (virtual and location-based). Design recommendations for mobile AR apps are discussed.Education Tech Research Dev (2016) 64:359-388 DOI 10.1007/s11423

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing virtual and location-based augmented reality mobile learning: emotions and learning outcomes

Harley

Poitras

Jarrell

et al. 2016

Education Tech Research Dev

140

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Research into new experiences for AR is exemplified by such European Union projects as Cultural Heritage Experiences through Socio-Personal Interactions and Storytelling (CHESS), aiming to integrate interdisciplinary research in personalization and adaptivity, digital storytelling, interaction methodologies, and narrative-oriented mobile and mixed reality technologies, with a sound theoretical basis in museological, cognitive, and learning sciences [Keil et al 2013]. As mobile devices become more powerful in terms of interactivity, data gathering, and Internet access, AR apps are becoming increasingly popular for heritage mapping (e.g., Historypin).…”

Section: Virtual Reality and Augmented Realitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Pure Land

Kenderdine

Chan

Shaw

2014

J. Comput. Cult. Herit.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article describes the design and implementation of the Pure Land projects, consisting of two visualization systems and their respective applications, Pure Land: Inside the Mogao Grottoes at Dunhuang [2012] and Pure Land Augmented Reality Edition [2012]. Each installation allows participants to engage in different ways with a full-scale augmented digital facsimile of Cave 220 from the UNESCO World Heritage site of the Mogao Grottoes, Gansu Province, northwestern China. This project is a collaboration between the Applied Laboratory for Interactive Visualization and Embodiment (ALiVE), City University of Hong Kong, and the Dunhuang Academy. In the Pure Land projects, the digital facsimiles of this cultural paragon have been transformed, providing formative personal experiences for museum visitors. The projects integrate high-resolution digital archeological datasets (photography and 3D architectural models) with immersive, interactive display systems. This work is of great importance because the treasuries of paintings and sculptures at Dunhuang are extremely vulnerable to human presence and, in the case of Cave 220, permanently closed to public visitors. Comprehensive digitization has become a primary method of preservation at the site. Both installations have been shown to the public at a variety of museums and galleries worldwide-to critical acclaim. The projects contribute to new strategies for rendering cultural content and heritage landscapes and suggest the future for embodied museography. Here, each project is described in detail, including innovations in interface technological application and user experience.

show abstract

“…Por todas estas circunstancias, la tecnología de realidad aumentada fue tomada en consideración dentro del proyecto CHESS (Cultural Heritage Experiences through Sociopersonal interactions and Storytelling), que realizó una guía multimedia para la sala del periodo arcaico del Museo de la Acrópolis en Atenas (Keil et al, 2013). Aquí permitía que el usuario realizara el recorrido acompañado de un dispositivo portátil que servía de guía de sala pero ofreciendo contenidos de gran interés.…”

Section: El Objeto Cultural Se Expande: Realidad Aumentada Y Mapeo VIunclassified

Guías multimedia con realidad aumentada en los museos del siglo XXI: la virtualidad como parte integrante del discurso expositivo

Torres

Gant

2017

MODOS: Rev. Hist. Arte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Guías multimedia con realidad aumentada en los museos del siglo XXI: la virtualidad como parte integrante del discurso expositivo Augmented reality museum tours in the 21st century: virtuality as part of the exhibition Dr. David Ruiz Torres Dra. Mª Luisa Bellido Gant Como citar: TORRES, D.R.; GANT, M.L.B. Guías multimedia con realidad aumentada en los museos del siglo XXI: la virtualidad como parte integrante del discurso expositivo. MODOS. Revista de História da Arte. Campinas, v. 1, n.1, p.175-184, jan. 2017 ResumenMuchos museos están empezando a incluir la tecnología de realidad aumentada en su discurso expositivo, desarrollando diversas aplicaciones que permiten al individuo realizar la visita al museo utilizando su propio dispositivo portátil como una guía multimedia. Esto demuestra, por una parte, como estas instituciones han logrado tomar parte en el fenómeno social de los dispositivos portátiles de última generación; y por otro cómo la tecnología de realidad aumentada se ha utilizado como una herramienta útil para interpretar el bien cultural. Palavras-claveRealidad aumentada; museo; recorrido multimedia; dispositivos portátiles; app. AbstractMany museums are beginning to include augmented reality technology in its exhibition discourse, developing several apps to the public that allow the museum visit using their own portable device as a multimedia guide. This shows on the one hand, how these institutions have managed to take sides in the social phenomenon of last generation portable devices; and on the other how augmented reality technology has been used as a useful tool for interpreting the cultural object.

show abstract

A digital look at physical museum exhibits: Designing personalized stories with handheld Augmented Reality in museums

Cited by 84 publications

References 13 publications

Comparing virtual and location-based augmented reality mobile learning: emotions and learning outcomes

Comparing virtual and location-based augmented reality mobile learning: emotions and learning outcomes

Pure Land

Guías multimedia con realidad aumentada en los museos del siglo XXI: la virtualidad como parte integrante del discurso expositivo

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About