1979
DOI: 10.3133/ofr79677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A digital model for simulation of ground-water hydrology in the Houston area, Texas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous computer programs by Meyer and Carr (1979), Williamson and others (1989), Leake and Prudic (1991), and Hoffmann and others (2003) assume preconsolidation stress is related to a preconsolidation head. The preconsolidation head is used to switch between elastic and inelastic storage properties-specific storage changes to inelastic values whenever the hydraulic head falls below the preconsolidation head.…”
Section: Preconsolidation Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous computer programs by Meyer and Carr (1979), Williamson and others (1989), Leake and Prudic (1991), and Hoffmann and others (2003) assume preconsolidation stress is related to a preconsolidation head. The preconsolidation head is used to switch between elastic and inelastic storage properties-specific storage changes to inelastic values whenever the hydraulic head falls below the preconsolidation head.…”
Section: Preconsolidation Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For aquifer systems that include compressible fine-grained interbeds ( fig. 1), existing model programs have been modified to account for release of water from compacting interbeds and to compute resulting compaction 1 and land subsidence (Meyer and Carr, 1979;Williamson and others, 1989;Leake and Prudic, 1991;Hoffmann and others, 2003). These computer programs keep track of head at which preconsolidation stress will be exceeded (preconsolidation head).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include simulation of water levels in an alluvial aquifer adjacent to a reservoir in eastern Texas (Garza, 1974); simulation of decline in water levels due to widespread ground-water withdrawals in southern Texas (Klemt and others, 1976); simulation of stream-aquifer interactions in Arkansas (Reed and Broom, 1979); simulation of declines in potentiometric surfaces of aquifers and land subsidence in the Houston area, Texas (Meyer and Carr, 1979;Carr and others, 1985); and simulation of water-level rises due to construction of navigation facilities on the Red River in northern Louisiana (Ludwig and Terry, 1980;Rogers, 1983). Simulations were made of water-level declines due to large ground-water withdrawals for northeastern Arkansas (Broom and Lyford, 1981); for the Memphis area, Tennessee (Brahana, 1982); for northwestern Mississippi (Sumner andWasson, 1984a, 1984b); for the Baton Rouge area, Louisiana (Torak and Whiteman, 1982;Huntzinger and others, 1985;Kuniansky, 1989); and for the Gulf Coastal Plain of Texas (Carr and others, 1985).…”
Section: Previous Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aquifers, (references), and confining units Chicot Reservoir (Jones and others, 1956) Chicot aquifer (Meyer and Carr, 1979) Evangeline aquifer !Whitfield, 1975) Evangeline aquifer (Meyer and Carr, 19791 Jasper aquifer (Whitfield, 19751 i …”
Section: Geologic Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%