2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A digraph permanent approach to evaluation and analysis of integrated watershed management system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The step-by-step methodology [36,37] that is used for developing the GT model is briefly described below:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The step-by-step methodology [36,37] that is used for developing the GT model is briefly described below:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, is useful for understanding the structure of the system, with all the noise parameters shown by vertices (S i ) and the directional interactions as edges (e i j ) [36,37] between them by arrows. It is not possible to carry out mathematical operations with this GT representation, to derive meaningful results.…”
Section: Graph Theoretic Model Of the Road Traffic Subsystem (Rts)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the subsystem variables considered and their interactions with each other are represented in the form of a matrix known as PFM ( permanent function matrix ). The model, along with the relevant parameters, is described in the form of a block diagram and then based on intuition, previous works, and expert opinion weights for the interaction terms are assigned (Prabhakaran et al 2006 ; Ratha and Agrawal 2015 ). The inconsistencies that may arise due to improper human judgment are taken care of using the Eigenvalue approach, as has been proved in the pioneering work of Hwang and Yoon (Hwang and Yoon 1981 ).…”
Section: Graph-theoretic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, IWM has been highlighted, which operates based on a combination of political, economic, social, environmental, technological, and legal dimensions and seeks to create balance and adaptation to optimal environmental, economic, cultural and social conditions (Wang et al, 2016). In management, the problem that has increased the optimal decision for watershed managers is the complexity and high cost of recognizing the relationships that exist between the components of natural and human factors (Ratha & Agrawal, 2015; Tranmer et al, 2020). Watershed managers often face problems in complex decision‐making because many factors and variables must be considered in decision‐making (Witlox, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%