2014
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/525/1/012009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dimensional comparison between embedded 3D-printed and silicon microchannels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed surface roughness in our device is due to the specific 3D printing technique (Inkjet 3D Printing) employed by the printer. 56 Smoother surfaces could be obtained with a stereolithography-based 3D printer, 54 which was not readily available for our use (Fig. S1 †).…”
Section: Device Fabrication and Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed surface roughness in our device is due to the specific 3D printing technique (Inkjet 3D Printing) employed by the printer. 56 Smoother surfaces could be obtained with a stereolithography-based 3D printer, 54 which was not readily available for our use (Fig. S1 †).…”
Section: Device Fabrication and Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PMMA is often used in the formation of microfluidic chips 37 , for example, in the form of molded structures.…”
Section: Precision In Harsh Environments P French Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D printers have been investigated as a means to print microfluidic channels affordably [33,34]. These methods have some practical uses, but are ultimately restricted to low resolution products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, 3D printed channels have been found to have greatly distorted side-wall roughness [34]. Until 3D printer technology improves, it has a limited range of use in microfluidic applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%