1998
DOI: 10.1109/9.718622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A direct characterization of L/sub 2/-gain controllers for LPV systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…D "0) is used due to the fact that a direct feed-through from the sensors may lead to undesirable levels of noise in the control. Furthermore, in many applications, the use of a strictly proper control does not result in any loss of generality [25,34]. As a result, in the design of output feedback control laws, we only consider the strictly proper controllers, which also simpli"es the exposition a great deal.…”
Section: Output Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…D "0) is used due to the fact that a direct feed-through from the sensors may lead to undesirable levels of noise in the control. Furthermore, in many applications, the use of a strictly proper control does not result in any loss of generality [25,34]. As a result, in the design of output feedback control laws, we only consider the strictly proper controllers, which also simpli"es the exposition a great deal.…”
Section: Output Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to linearity, however, it su$ces to have the inequality hold only at the vertices of the parameter set (see Reference [34] for details). As a result, Equation (20) represents a number of linear matrix inequalities (e.g.…”
Section: State Feedback Controllersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It follows from (22), if a stability condition is affine dependent on _ hðtÞ, then the only need is to check the vertex values of _ hðtÞ instead of checking all the values of _ hðtÞ [43]. From expressions (12)-(22), we can get…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the introduced free-weighing matrices increase the calculation complexity as well as computational complexity. For the RNNs with interval time-varying delays, work [43] has contributed an improved stability criterion by construction of a suitable augmented LKF and utilization of Wirtinger-based integral inequality with reciprocally convex approach. Following the work [37], both the ability and the performance of neural networks are influenced considerably by the choice of the activation functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%