2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.12.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A direct-flame solid oxide fuel cell (DFFC) operated on methane, propane, and butane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
51
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct-flame SOFCs have been operated with a variety of gaseous, liquid, and solid fuels, including methane [2], propane [6], butane [4], ethylene [5], ethanol [15], methanol [8], parrafin [4], and wood [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Direct-flame SOFCs have been operated with a variety of gaseous, liquid, and solid fuels, including methane [2], propane [6], butane [4], ethylene [5], ethanol [15], methanol [8], parrafin [4], and wood [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OCV in the range 750 to 950 mV is typical, and OCV near the theoretical maximum can be achieved [12,28], suggesting that the effects of mixing of fuel and air at the unsealed edge of the cell can be minimized. Note that SOFCs operating pure hydrogen vs. air display OCV near 1.1 V; the lower OCV for direct-flame configuration is a consequence of the relatively lower concentration of electrochemically-active fuel species (H 2 and CO) and higher oxygen partial pressure (CO 2 , H 2 O) present in the flame [6,28]. The concentration of all species varies spatially within the flame, so optimal placement of the cell within the flame can be important for maximizing performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a significant challenge in a dual chamber configuration in which the fuel cells are sealed to create separate fuel and oxidant chambers (Milcarek et al, 2016e;Milcarek et al, 2016f). To avoid the sealing challenges a single chamber configuration (Priestnall et al, 2002;Raz et al, 2002;Riess 2008;Riess et al, 1995) and a no-chamber, Direct Flame Fuel Cell (DFFC) (Endo and Nakamura 2014;Horiuchi et al, 2004;Kronemayer et al, 2007;Sun et al, 2010;Vogler et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2014b;Wang et al, 2013;Yu-guang Wang et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2014a;Zhu et al 2012), have been proposed. While the DFFC configuration can perform rapid startup and thermal cycling, challenges persist with low fuel utilization, electrical efficiency, and thermal stresses due to an uneven temperature distribution of the flame over the fuel cell surface (Wang et al, 2015(Wang et al, , 2011Wang et al, 2014b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, SC-SOFC developed up to now can only use gaseous fuels directly, thereby limiting its range of fuel flexibility. To overcome the limitation of the conventional dual-chamber SOFC and SC-SOFC, Kronemayer et al [37] proposed an innovative concept of a direct-flame fuel cell (DFFC) operated without a gas chamber. The operation principle of DFFC is based on the combination of a flame with a SOFC in a simple, "no-chamber" setup.…”
Section: R E T R a C T E D R E T R A C T E D R E T R A C T E D R E T mentioning
confidence: 99%