2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A direct measurement of the high-mass end of the velocity dispersion function at z ∼ 0.55 from SDSS-III/BOSS

Abstract: We report the first direct spectroscopic measurement of the velocity dispersion function (VDF) for the high-mass red sequence (RS) galaxy population at redshift z ∼ 0.55. We achieve high precision by using a sample of 600,000 massive galaxies with spectra from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) of the third Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-III), covering stellar masses M * 10 11 M ⊙ . We determine the VDF by projecting the joint probability-density function (PDF) of luminosity L and velocity disp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also some systematic errors due to the uncertainty of the velocity distribution function of lensing galaxies (equation 21). In this work, we adopt the modified Schechter function with parameters from Choi et al (2007) based on the SDSS DR3 data, while other authors using different data bases obtain somewhat different parameters (see Montero-Dorta et al 2017, for a recent comparison). Also, different strategies for sample selection and function modelling can affect the shape of the velocity distribution function (see e.g.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also some systematic errors due to the uncertainty of the velocity distribution function of lensing galaxies (equation 21). In this work, we adopt the modified Schechter function with parameters from Choi et al (2007) based on the SDSS DR3 data, while other authors using different data bases obtain somewhat different parameters (see Montero-Dorta et al 2017, for a recent comparison). Also, different strategies for sample selection and function modelling can affect the shape of the velocity distribution function (see e.g.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison with the Field Velocity Dispersion Function There are several VDF measurements for quiescent (or early-type) galaxies in the field based on SDSS and/or BOSS spectroscopy (Sheth et al 2003;Mitchell et al 2005;Choi et al 2007;Chae 2010;Montero-Dorta et al 2017;Sohn et al 2017b). These field VDFs differ from one another possibly due to differences in sample selection.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These strong lensing studies underscore the fundamental importance of the central velocity dispersions. The velocity dispersion distribution, i.e., the velocity dispersion function (VDF hereafter), has been measured for general field galaxies based on the SDSS and BOSS galaxy surveys (Sheth et al 2003;Mitchell et al 2005;Choi et al 2007;Bernardi et al 2010;Montero-Dorta et al 2017). These VDFs measured from the general galaxy population, which we refer to as field VDFs, have similar shapes at σ > 150 km s −1 , but they differ substantially for σ ≤ 150 km s −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that several studies point to the stellar velocity dispersion as the best tracer of halo mass (e.g., Zahid et al 2016Zahid et al , 2019. This motivates the use of the velocity dispersion function (VDF, e.g., Montero-Dorta et al 2017a) in the context of halo-galaxy connection models.…”
Section: The Correlations Between Halo and Galaxy Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%