2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2013.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A direct method for evaluating the concentration of boric acid in a fuel pool using scintillation detectors for joint-multiplicity measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of collecting data from a 252 Cf-source, pulse shape discrimination was performed in a way similar to [20] by using a charge comparison method [21]. In Figure 6 it is seen that the neutrons and gammas are well separated.…”
Section: Description Of An Experimental Set-up and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of collecting data from a 252 Cf-source, pulse shape discrimination was performed in a way similar to [20] by using a charge comparison method [21]. In Figure 6 it is seen that the neutrons and gammas are well separated.…”
Section: Description Of An Experimental Set-up and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data have been collected by an EJ-309 (D76 x 76 mm) LS at six different energy levels ranging from a high of 2,000 keVee to a low of 150 keVee. The settings and geometry of the experimental setup have already been described in [34].…”
Section: The Characteristics and Pre-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MATLAB Neural Networks Toolbox [33] has been used for all the ANN implementations. The n-γ dataset employed here is also used in [34][35], and contains PSD data from a wide range of energy levels, with a variable number of patterns collected at each energy level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data was collected during 3646 seconds with a dead time of 1.26 % for the steel container and during 3617 seconds with a dead time of 0.47 % for the copper cask. Experimental errors were estimated as in [21]. Thus, the live time of measurement was always equal to 3600 seconds.…”
Section: Description Of the Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%