Agricultural Productivity 2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0851-9_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Disaggregated Perspective on Post-War Productivity Growth in U.S. Agriculture: Isn’t That Spatial?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agriculture, these are often the prices that the farmers in the region are paid for their products. As noted by Acquaye et al (2002), such prices may be policy-distorted and the whole aggregation approach is "somewhat questionable, but standard". An alternative is to use the market prices where available.…”
Section: Removal Of Outliers and Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agriculture, these are often the prices that the farmers in the region are paid for their products. As noted by Acquaye et al (2002), such prices may be policy-distorted and the whole aggregation approach is "somewhat questionable, but standard". An alternative is to use the market prices where available.…”
Section: Removal Of Outliers and Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Index number problems can account for some errors in the measurement of productivity growth attributable to research, and aggregate productivity measures can be statistically sensitive to aggregation procedures (e.g. Acquaye et al, 2000).…”
Section: 1 Productivity Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the appropriate adjustments of the dependent variable can be different, depending upon the explanatory variables other than public R&D that are to be included in the model to account for the effects of input and output quality, and so on. Pardey (1996, 2001) and Acquaye et al (2000), among others, have shown that correcting for changes in input quality can have major implications for understanding changes in input use and productivity in US agriculture. Making adjustments for input quality change is likely to lead to a lower estimated rate of return to public-sector R&D and a better appreciation of the different roles played by private-and public-sector R&D (in agriculture and elsewhere), and education.…”
Section: 1 Productivity Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%