2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A discontinuity in theTeff–radius relation of M-dwarfs

Abstract: We report on 13 new high-precision measurements of stellar diameters for low-mass dwarfs obtained by means of near-infrared long-baseline interferometry with PIO-NIER at the Very Large Telescope Interferometer. Together with accurate parallaxes from Gaia DR2, these measurements provide precise estimates for their linear radii, effective temperatures, masses, and luminosities. This allows us to refine the effective temperature scale, in particular towards the coolest M-dwarfs. We measure for late-type stars wit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
59
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
7
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…b Only a partial transit was observed based on a larger grid of interferometric radii yielded consistent results (Rabus et al 2019). Uncertainties in M * and R * account for both measurement errors (in K S and parallax) and uncertainties in the calibrations.…”
Section: Timing Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…b Only a partial transit was observed based on a larger grid of interferometric radii yielded consistent results (Rabus et al 2019). Uncertainties in M * and R * account for both measurement errors (in K S and parallax) and uncertainties in the calibrations.…”
Section: Timing Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Number of stars that would be detectable, either assuming a maximum exposure time with no noise floor or assuming that the stochastic noise floor is limited to a 1-sigma noise envelope of 1 ppm, 3 ppm, or 5 ppm. Rabus et al (2019) underestimates temperature for Proxima Centauri. We override the temperature with 3000 K, an approximation from Boyajian et al (2012).…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, Muirhead et al (2018) do not apply this relation to stars with T eff 2700K because the calibration sample used in Mann et al (2015) does not include stars in this low-temperature regime. Therefore certain stars in the CDC do not have an assigned temperature, and thus did not survive our initial stellar effective temperature cut of 2600 K < T eff < 4500 K. Because M dwarfs in this low-temperature regime (such as TRAPPIST-1) are of great interest to the community, we estimate the stellar temperatures for these stars ourselves using the discontinuous T eff -radius relation from Rabus et al (2019). Rabus et al (2019) use high-precision interferometry measurements of M dwarfs to derive two separate empirical relations between T eff and radius for stars with masses M < 0.23 M and M ≥ 0.23 M respectively.…”
Section: Selecting Tess Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations