2008
DOI: 10.1002/nme.2312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A discontinuous‐Galerkin‐based immersed boundary method

Abstract: SUMMARYA numerical method to approximate partial differential equations on meshes that do not conform to the domain boundaries is introduced. The proposed method is conceptually simple and free of userdefined parameters. Starting with a conforming finite element mesh, the key ingredient is to switch those elements intersected by the Dirichlet boundary to a discontinuous-Galerkin approximation and impose the Dirichlet boundary conditions strongly. By virtue of relaxing the continuity constraint at those element… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
104
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
104
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When the complete variationl formulation (47) is discretized (see section 3.2), the internal work integrals (48) and (52) The matrix and vector coefficients of the discrete equations follow from the partial derivatives of equations (48) and (49) with respect to the displacement degrees of freedom in analogy to (44). In particular, the discretized form K N IT rs is computed as…”
Section: Discretization Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the complete variationl formulation (47) is discretized (see section 3.2), the internal work integrals (48) and (52) The matrix and vector coefficients of the discrete equations follow from the partial derivatives of equations (48) and (49) with respect to the displacement degrees of freedom in analogy to (44). In particular, the discretized form K N IT rs is computed as…”
Section: Discretization Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, accurate estimation techniques are often delicate from an algorithmic viewpoint [43,44,46]. Therefore, there has been an increasing interest in methods that can enforce boundary and interface conditions without mesh dependent stabilization parameters [38,[47][48][49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the choice of interpolation in the intersected elements, the requirementˆh V Dˆh R D N on h is either enforced in a weak sense (e.g., the extended finite element method [36,37]), or in a strong sense (e.g., the immersed boundary discontinuous-Galerkin method, IB-DG [38]). In this work, we assume the use of the IB-DG method and that after such efforts, the electrical boundary value problem can be stated as follows: Findˆ, such that…”
Section: Semi-discrete Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this gives the full operator for a direct solution of (38), the assembly via (41) is expensive. As advocated in [6], we instead employ the generalized minimal residual method (GMRES) so that only the application of the operator is needed.…”
Section: Direct Solution Of Cyclic Steady Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neste caso, a dificuldade é transferida para a construção do espaço de multiplicadores. Lew and Buscaglia (2008) apresentaram um método de imposição direta baseado em uma formulação de Galerkin descontínuo, que evita o tratamento caso-a-caso simplesmente trocando a interpolação nas células interceptadas pelo contorno por uma interpolação descontínua, evitando assim o fenômeno de bloqueio (locking). Embora consiga impor fortemente as condições de contorno e obter precisão ótima, o método necessita de graus de liberdade adicionais.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified