2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Discontinuous Galerkin Material Point Method for the solution of impact problems in solid dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where max is the maximum angular frequency of the whole system. Assuming the external force f ext iI to be zero, the momentum equation (4) can be rewritten into vector form as follows Mü = f int (24) in which M is the system mass matrix with the displacements and forces of all the grid nodes being arranged into a vector, such as…”
Section: Critical Time Step Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where max is the maximum angular frequency of the whole system. Assuming the external force f ext iI to be zero, the momentum equation (4) can be rewritten into vector form as follows Mü = f int (24) in which M is the system mass matrix with the displacements and forces of all the grid nodes being arranged into a vector, such as…”
Section: Critical Time Step Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a small CFL number is usually required by the explicit MPM for stability, sometimes even smaller than 0.1, if the critical time step is determined by the formula similar to that used in the finite element method. [23][24][25][26] More and more scholars find that the particle distribution will heavily affect the stability of simulations. 24,[27][28][29] There are a lot of works on the stability analysis of other particle methods [30][31][32][33] and cell-crossing error in MPM or its variants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the local damping leads to energy dissipation, inaccuracies in the time‐dependent simulations, such as in the consolidation process and, in extreme cases, to an over‐damped system with qualitatively different characteristics. To avoid these severe limitations, for example, Lu et al and Renaud et al combined the time‐discontinuous Galerkin method to the MPM to control the spurious noises. Furthermore, Jiang et al have shown that the use of the PIC scheme can filter the spurious noises in the velocity but leads to an excessive dissipation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note also that the numerical diffusion exhibited by the PIC can be limited by reducing the domain of influence of nodes rather than modifying the projections themselves. This approach is followed in the Discontinuous Galerkin Material Point Method (DGMPM) [1,2]. The introduction of the DG approximation within the MPM, combined with the use of the PIC projection, thus aims at providing non-oscillating discontinuous solutions with low numerical diffusion due to the support of the shape functions that reduces to one cell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%