2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2007.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A discontinuous stabilized mortar method for general 3D elastic problems

Abstract: First, the present paper is concerned with the extension to linearized elastodynamics of the optimal results known in statics for the mortar method. It also analyzes and tests a new couple of displacements/Lagrange multipliers for the method, as proposed independently by F. Ben Belgacem [6] and the authors [21]. Finally, questions of practical implementation in the presence of curved interfaces are addressed and validated from the numerical point of view.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(55 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the mortar method can be seen as a variational multi-scale finite element method [41,51,59,87,140].…”
Section: The Mortar Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, the mortar method can be seen as a variational multi-scale finite element method [41,51,59,87,140].…”
Section: The Mortar Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional references dealing with mortar methods can be found in [9,16,47,49,51,59,108,171]. The reader may also refer to [41,51,59,87,140] for specific applications to linear isotropic elasticity and elliptic problems.…”
Section: Domain Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In (4.6) and (4.7), the most robust choice is to take for V h , respectively, the continuous first-order and secondorder finite element spaces augmented with suitable face bubbles on Γ, leading to an inf-sup constant β h in (4.3) independent of h in both 2D/1D and 3D/2D settings; see [2,17]. In 2D/1D whenever at least one of the endpoints of Γ is free, it is also possible to take (4.7); then, the discrete inf-sup condition (4.3) still holds, but the constant β h is of order h. The choice (4.8) has been introduced in [25] and differs from the two previous choices in the fact that Λ h = M h .…”
Section: The Discrete Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, these techniques provide a very flexible and computationally attractive setting to handle numerically coupled multi-physics problems. Mortar methods have been applied successfully in many engineering applications, such as, e.g., contact problems [4][5][6][7], dynamic and static structural analysis [8][9][10], flow problems [11][12][13] and coupled problems in acoustics [14,15]. Further, the mortar method is used to simulate eigenvalue problems in [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%