1971
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1971.tb00899.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Discrimination Index for Items in Instruments Using Group Responses

Abstract: Item discrimination for instruments used to measure characteristics by means of group responses is stressed. It is argued that a percentage of the total sum of squares which is due to groups can appropriately be used as an index of item discrimination.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
1

Year Published

1976
1976
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first phase of assessing the construct validity of the SIQ was to select dis criminating items from the piloted instrument using the Menne and Tolsma (1971) methodology. Item discrimination power ensures that the questions selected are in deed valid as determined by the process of social validity or mass authorship.…”
Section: Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The first phase of assessing the construct validity of the SIQ was to select dis criminating items from the piloted instrument using the Menne and Tolsma (1971) methodology. Item discrimination power ensures that the questions selected are in deed valid as determined by the process of social validity or mass authorship.…”
Section: Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Menne and Tolsma (1971) procedure has been used by Hidlebaugh (1973), Look (1983), Judkins (1987), and Lueders (1987) for instrument development to determine if the discrimination power of items differed among group responses. The technique uses analysis of variance in which a percentage of total sum of squares due to the pattern of between-group variance determines whether an item discriminates.…”
Section: Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Increasingly, the appropriateness of using one device for both purposes is being questioned. Whitely and Doyle (1978) ;Fanslow, Zimmerman, and Wolins (1978); and Menne and Tolsma (1971) suggest that the methods by which a device is developed to represent overall climate differ from those used to portray an individual's perception. As a minimum, they suggest the data used to develop assessments of classroom climates ought to be based on items that differentiate between classes.…”
Section: Differentiation Of Classroom Climatementioning
confidence: 99%