2015
DOI: 10.1111/lamp.12079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Discursive Institutionalist Approach to Understanding Comparative Policy Change:Ireland andMexico in the 1980s

Abstract: Employing the critical juncture theory, a discursive institutionalist approach, this article examines the nature of changes to Irish industrial policy and to Mexican macroeconomic policy in the early 1980s. Were these significant changes, or were they continuations of previously established policy pathways? The critical juncture theory consists of three elements—economic crisis, ideational change, and the nature of the policy change—that we must identify to be able to declare with some certainty if the policy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it still does not clearly explain how a certain policy idea can affect the policy actors' interests and consequent institutional changes. Specifically, in order to bring a gender perspective using the traditional institutionalism approach, it is challenging to explore how a policy idea (GM in this study) has impacted on the policy arena as well as policy interests, or even alternative ideas generated thus leading to institutional changes (Finlayson, 2007;Schmidt, 2008;Hogan and O'Rourke, 2015).…”
Section: Discursive Instit Utionalism and The Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it still does not clearly explain how a certain policy idea can affect the policy actors' interests and consequent institutional changes. Specifically, in order to bring a gender perspective using the traditional institutionalism approach, it is challenging to explore how a policy idea (GM in this study) has impacted on the policy arena as well as policy interests, or even alternative ideas generated thus leading to institutional changes (Finlayson, 2007;Schmidt, 2008;Hogan and O'Rourke, 2015).…”
Section: Discursive Instit Utionalism and The Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%