2005
DOI: 10.1021/ie0402719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Disjunctive Cutting-Plane-Based Branch-and-Cut Algorithm for 0−1 Mixed-Integer Convex Nonlinear Programs

Abstract: In this paper, a disjunctive cutting-plane-based branch-and-cut algorithm is developed to solve the 0-1 mixedinteger convex nonlinear programming (MINLP) problems. In a branch-and-bound framework, the 0-1 MINLP problem is approximated with a 0-1 mixed-integer linear program at each node, and then the lift-and-project technology is used to generate valid cuts to accelerate the branching process. The cut is produced by solving a linear program that is transformed from a projection problem, in terms of the disjun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No such extension is known in the case of MINLP. Zhu and Kuno [114] have suggested to replace the true nonlinear convex hull by a linear approximation taken about the solution to a linearized master problem like MP(K).…”
Section: Disjunctivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…No such extension is known in the case of MINLP. Zhu and Kuno [114] have suggested to replace the true nonlinear convex hull by a linear approximation taken about the solution to a linearized master problem like MP(K).…”
Section: Disjunctivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are specialized cut generation schemes for Mixed 0-1 SDPs [15], [16], but these methods are also based on the convex hull approach mentioned above and therefore inherit its limitations. The cut-generation itself is even more computationally intensive than in the MILP case.…”
Section: B Convex-hull Reformulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We require the control inputs x to be chosen in such a way that the state constraints (10), (13a) and (15a) hold robustly for all ζ ∈ Z and ξ ∈ Ξ when the functions in (16) are substituted for the vehicle positions and velocities. Similarly, we aim at minimizing the objective criterion (9) in view of the worstcase realization of ζ ∈ Z and ξ ∈ Ξ when the functions in (16) are substituted for the vehicle positions and velocities. By using now standard techniques due to Löfberg [22] and El Ghaoui et al [23], the resulting robust control problem over x and y can be reformulated as an MISDP of the type (2).…”
Section: G Robust Control Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, the disjunctive cutting plane developed by Stubbs and Mehrotra19 is obtained by solving a convex projection problem, which is computationally expensive and always encounters nondifferential problems. Recently, Zhu and Kuno23 developed a new disjunctive cut generation approach where the disjunctive cut is produced by solving a linear programming problem rather than a nonlinear programming problem. The critical finding of Zhu and Kuno23 approach is that a lift‐and‐project cutting plane that is valid for the original MINLP problem and cuts the fractional solution away can be generated based on the polyhedral outer approximation of the mixed‐integer nonlinear set of the original MINLP problem at the current node.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Zhu and Kuno23 developed a new disjunctive cut generation approach where the disjunctive cut is produced by solving a linear programming problem rather than a nonlinear programming problem. The critical finding of Zhu and Kuno23 approach is that a lift‐and‐project cutting plane that is valid for the original MINLP problem and cuts the fractional solution away can be generated based on the polyhedral outer approximation of the mixed‐integer nonlinear set of the original MINLP problem at the current node. In this article, the cut generating, lifting, and strengthening approach proposed by Balas et al20 for MILP problem is used to replace the cut generating linear programming in our former work, and the specific implementation issues are discussed and incorporated into the algorithmic development to handle large‐scale MINLP problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%