2019
DOI: 10.33545/orthor.2019.v3.i1a.07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A distal third extra-articular humerus fractures treated with precontoured single anatomical locking plates: A retrospective study of 11 cases

Abstract: Background: Distal third humerus shaft fractures are difficult entity to manage with. Regional Anatomy and acting forces at the region makes its management tricky to have a good functional results. Conventional platting when used have a limited distal fragment purchased. we used anatomical precontoured single 3.5 mm locking plates in 11 patients with distal third extra articular humerus fractures. Materials and methods:We have studied a retrospective study of 11 patients presented to our institute with an extr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with our results, Biz et al [31] documented radiographic consolidation of calcaneal fractures in an average of around three months (12 weeks). Radiological union often emerges between two and three months after intra-articular calcaneus fractures are stabilized, according to research by Rajesh V. Chawda et al [32] The majority of patients were rated as good, followed by excellent, and fair, according to the AOFAS score. As few as two patients had subpar AOFAS results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with our results, Biz et al [31] documented radiographic consolidation of calcaneal fractures in an average of around three months (12 weeks). Radiological union often emerges between two and three months after intra-articular calcaneus fractures are stabilized, according to research by Rajesh V. Chawda et al [32] The majority of patients were rated as good, followed by excellent, and fair, according to the AOFAS score. As few as two patients had subpar AOFAS results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%