Roughly 45 years ago, when I started teaching neuroanatomy, it was customary to present the brainstem as built by three blocks, the medulla oblongata, the pons (with the cerebellum) and the midbrain. The ponto-mesencephalic or caudal midbrain limit was traced along the sulcus that runs above the pons and its continuation, the middle cerebellar peduncle. The boundary passed below the lemniscal trigone (which contains the superior cerebellar peduncle and the lateral lemniscus tracts), and finished dorsally at the superior medullary velum, caudal to the trochlear nerve root. The mes-diencephalic border represented the rostral midbrain limit, which was given by an imaginary plane passing in front of the superior colliculus (behind, across, or in front of the posterior commissure, depending on the authors). This limit passed behind the medial geniculate body and ended ventrally at the upper end of the interventricular fossa, close to the mamillary bodies. The whole interpeduncular fossa and visible peduncles were held to be mesencephalic, and so were the oculomotor and trochlear nerves (Figure 1a).This classic concept of the midbrain limits has not stood the test of time, due to accrued developmental knowledge and recent gene expression patterns implying strongly that both limits defined above are inexact. It has been shown that the old 'midbrain' does not represent a developmental unit, because it is too inclusive: it encompasses diencephalic derivatives rostrally and hindbrain derivatives caudally. A new, more restricted concept of the midbrain has emerged (Figure 1b), which is consistent with gene patterns, patterning mechanisms, and modern notions about neuromeric structure of the neural tube (the prosomeric model). This essay aims to summarize the new data and explain the resulting changes in the midbrain concept, ending with a summary of present knowledge about its inner structure (internal transversal, longitudinal and radial parts, and corresponding derivatives).
Molecular Patterning of the MidbrainIt seems convenient to summarize at the start the present embryologic knowledge about patterning of the midbrain, since this provides a causal background that necessarily applies to any morphologic considerations. Incipient differential specification of the neural ectoderm occurs along the dorsoventral and anteroposterior dimensions, starting at early neural plate stages.
Comments on the limits and internal structure of the mammalian midbrain
Luis Puelles
Department of Human Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
AbstractThe anatomic concept of the midbrain has changed considerably in recent times, due to advances in molecular developmental neurobiology which have shown the mechanisms that pattern the midbrain relative to diencephalon and hindbrain, as well as relative to its inner structure. The midbrain unitary developmental field that was discovered in this way is smaller than the classic concept of the midbrain, which therefore necessarily included portions of the caudal diencephalon ...