2015
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A distinct section of the early bronze age society? Stable isotope investigations of burials in settlement pits and multiple inhumations of the Únětice culture in central germany

Abstract: The analytical results let to conclude that inhumations in settlement pits and multiple burials were two of the manifold burial practices of the Early Bronze Age. The selection criteria of the individuals for the different forms of inhumation remained undisclosed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The high proportion of nonlocal females occurs at the same time as a high and increasing haplotype diversity, i.e., a high diversity of maternal lineages, and is consistent with a patrilocal residential system and female exogamy (39,40). Predominantly nonlocal females were also found in BBC contexts in southern Bavaria (especially if 0.71050 is used as 87 Sr/ 86 Sr cutoff), Austria, Hungary, the Czech Republic (18), and Britain (21), among CWC burials in southern Germany (12), and EBA inhumations in central Germany (24), pointing to a supraregional prevalence of patrilocal residential rules. The pattern is, however, most striking in the Lech River valley.…”
Section: Stable Isotope Analysissupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high proportion of nonlocal females occurs at the same time as a high and increasing haplotype diversity, i.e., a high diversity of maternal lineages, and is consistent with a patrilocal residential system and female exogamy (39,40). Predominantly nonlocal females were also found in BBC contexts in southern Bavaria (especially if 0.71050 is used as 87 Sr/ 86 Sr cutoff), Austria, Hungary, the Czech Republic (18), and Britain (21), among CWC burials in southern Germany (12), and EBA inhumations in central Germany (24), pointing to a supraregional prevalence of patrilocal residential rules. The pattern is, however, most striking in the Lech River valley.…”
Section: Stable Isotope Analysissupporting
confidence: 53%
“…not occur together, as well as finished artifacts (22). Isotope analyses in EBA contexts revealed a heterogenic picture ranging from no clear indication for nonlocal individuals at Singen in southwest Germany (23) to a few nonlocal persons in mostly smaller burial communities in central Germany (24), while data from Ún etice contexts in Silesia (Poland), were interpreted to be a reflection of "hypermobility" (25).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, several areas within Europe might be characterized by overlapping ranges which provides additional difficulties and challenges in delineating specific potential areas of origin. At the moment, the closest areas that seem to meet baseline ranges characterized by 87 Sr/ 86 Sr values of ~ 0.713 are: to the south, middle-eastern Germany [55], northeastern Netherlands [56], and northeastern Czech Republic [57]; to the north, southern Sweden [58]; and to the west, some areas in Britain [59]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strontium isotope values above 0.7105 are rather uncommon for the Rhine region and other lowland areas, including the North Sea area, but are typical for low and high mountain ranges with Mesozoic, Paleozoic, and older rocks (Bentley & Knipper, ; Brettell et al, ; Gillmaier et al, ; Knipper et al, ; McManus et al, ; Müller, Fricke, Halliday, McCulloch, & Wartho, ; Oelze et al, ; Smits, Millard, Nowell, & Pearson, ; Voerkelius et al, ). However, a recent study has shown that highly radiogenic bioavailable strontium signatures also occur in lowland localities which are influenced by glacial till of Scandinavian origin such as the Middle Elbe‐Saale region (Knipper et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%