2001
DOI: 10.1007/s004280000340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A distinctive melanocytic lesion associated with melanoma-prone dysplastic naevus syndrome: the hybrid naevus

Abstract: Clinically and histologically, the concept of dysplastic nevi remains controversial. To elaborate more precise criteria for the nevi of patients with dysplastic naevus syndrome (DNS), we examined 58 nevi from seven DNS patients who developed one or several malignant melanomas. Clinical presentation and histomorphology were evaluated, and immunohistochemistry was performed using proliferation marker Ki-S5 and antibody DO-7 to the p53 protein. Sixty nevi from individuals without history of melanoma served as con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1A,C). 45,46 Both lesions show various degrees of cellular atypia consisting of atypical nuclei of varying sizes and shapes, nuclear hyperchromasia and prominent nucleoli 46–48 . In our experience, it is by far most often the silhouette of the melanocytic lesion that renders the most important diagnostic feature allowing for a distinction between a severely dysplastic nevus and a melanoma, most importantly circumscription or lack thereof and symmetry or asymmetry 31,49–52 .…”
Section: Ki‐67 Staining In Dysplastic Nevi and Malignant Melanomamentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1A,C). 45,46 Both lesions show various degrees of cellular atypia consisting of atypical nuclei of varying sizes and shapes, nuclear hyperchromasia and prominent nucleoli 46–48 . In our experience, it is by far most often the silhouette of the melanocytic lesion that renders the most important diagnostic feature allowing for a distinction between a severely dysplastic nevus and a melanoma, most importantly circumscription or lack thereof and symmetry or asymmetry 31,49–52 .…”
Section: Ki‐67 Staining In Dysplastic Nevi and Malignant Melanomamentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, they also showed the growth fraction in the familial dysplastic nevi to be consistently less than that observed in the superficial spreading melanoma group, namely 2.5% vs. 6%. Schubert et al's 45 results help illustrate the point that, although histologically worrisome, both sporadic dysplastic nevi and dysplastic nevi from DNS patients stay in the benign proliferative range, whether defined as less than 4% or less than 6%.…”
Section: Ki‐67 Staining In Dysplastic Nevi and Malignant Melanomamentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The first melanoma in our patient had been reported as “spitzoid,” whereas the second showed “Reed nevus‐like” histopathologic features. Moreover, the reexcision specimen showed areas of melanocytic proliferation akin to the so‐called “hybrid” (dysplastic‐spitzoid) nevus, 18 a morphologic marker of risk of melanoma. Finally, the patient had a Spitz nevus excised from her abdomen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%