2017 American Control Conference (ACC) 2017
DOI: 10.23919/acc.2017.7963249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A distributed observer for a time-invariant linear system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, we include a definition and a necessary assumption for the solvability of Problem 4. [7] and [24]), then Assumption 6 holds true. However, Assumption 6 is in general less restrictive, as it does not enforce connectivity of the network (see for instance the example in Figure 1).…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we include a definition and a necessary assumption for the solvability of Problem 4. [7] and [24]), then Assumption 6 holds true. However, Assumption 6 is in general less restrictive, as it does not enforce connectivity of the network (see for instance the example in Figure 1).…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to [11,33,10,24,37], where only minimum variance solution is studied, and from [34], where the consensus parameters minimize the steady-state mean-square prediction error. In [26,35,29] distributed observers are designed for the case where the state is only partially observable by each sensor, but the estimation weights are designed to guarantee convergence and state omniscience properties, not optimizing bias and error variance features. In [21], the considered problem for distributed estimation is similar, dealing with the design of the consensus parameters and local innovation gains to optimize a different performance criterion.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observe that the KKT conditions hold by imposing ξ i2 = 0 only if λ i is null because of Eq. (35) and therefore ξ i1 = 0 because of Eq. (34).…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While they vary in their aims, as for example being robust with respect to disturbances as in [8], a key characteristic of an observer is the convergence rate of the error. This has only recently been addressed in [9], where a design was proposed yielding a H. Silm and J.-P. Richard are with Univ. Lille, Inria, CNRS, Centrale Lille, UMR 9189 -CRIStAL -Centre de recherche en Informatique Signal et Automatique de Lille, F-59000 Lille, France (e-mail: haik.silm@inria.fr; jean-pierre.richard@centralelille.fr).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%