2021
DOI: 10.7554/elife.70601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A distributed residue network permits conformational binding specificity in a conserved family of actin remodelers

Abstract: Metazoan proteomes contain many paralogous proteins that have evolved distinct functions. The Ena/VASP family of actin regulators consists of three members that share an EVH1 interaction domain with a 100 % conserved binding site. A proteome-wide screen revealed photoreceptor cilium actin regulator (PCARE) as a high-affinity ligand for ENAH EVH1. Here, we report the surprising observation that PCARE is ~100-fold specific for ENAH over paralogs VASP and EVL and can selectively bind ENAH and inhibit ENAH-depende… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we showed how defining the EVH1 binding motif as [FWYL]PXΦP is an over-simplification and how, by systematically examining the role of flanking sequences for just one EVH1 domain, we readily uncovered numerous examples in which the binding is modulated via additional extra-motif residues. Added to prior reports from investigations of individual interactions ( Stein and Aloy, 2008 ; Li et al, 2018a ; Aitio et al, 2010 ), our work definitively demonstrates the importance of sequence context on SLiM behavior by illustrating specific mechanisms, including an unusual conformational specificity mechanism that is documented in our companion paper ( Hwang et al, 2021 ). MassTitr provides a versatile experimental platform for uncovering context effects on domain-peptide interactions and will surely lead to similar insights into the recognition strategies of other domains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Here we showed how defining the EVH1 binding motif as [FWYL]PXΦP is an over-simplification and how, by systematically examining the role of flanking sequences for just one EVH1 domain, we readily uncovered numerous examples in which the binding is modulated via additional extra-motif residues. Added to prior reports from investigations of individual interactions ( Stein and Aloy, 2008 ; Li et al, 2018a ; Aitio et al, 2010 ), our work definitively demonstrates the importance of sequence context on SLiM behavior by illustrating specific mechanisms, including an unusual conformational specificity mechanism that is documented in our companion paper ( Hwang et al, 2021 ). MassTitr provides a versatile experimental platform for uncovering context effects on domain-peptide interactions and will surely lead to similar insights into the recognition strategies of other domains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Truncation experiments indicated that the 14-residues C-terminal of the LPPPP motif in PCARE are critical for its high affinity, hinting that extensive contacts between this region and the ENAH EVH1 domain could be responsible for the enhanced binding. Our subsequent work revealed the surprising structural basis for this affinity ( Hwang et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, EVH1-binding motifs might facilitate interaction with Protein-enabled homolog (ENAH) and Vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) PCARE interactor proteins that we have identified in yeast two-hybrid screening and tandem affinity purification studies ( 9 ). A very recent structural study has shown that PCARE binds with a high affinity to the EVH1 domain of the protein ENAH, which as noted we had previously identified as a PCARE interactor, that plays a role in actin polymerization and cytoskeletal remodelling ( 29 ). Taken together, these studies establish that PCARE acts through ENAH to regulate actin filament assembly in the eye photoreceptor cilium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%