2010 Seventh International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery 2010
DOI: 10.1109/fskd.2010.5569084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A distributed SVM for image annotation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 shows the efficiency of the MRMSVM in SVM training which achieved close to 12 times in speedup. Figure 5 shows the efficiency of the MRMSVM in comparison with MRSMO [27] which is one against all based distributed multiclass SVM. MRMSVM is more efficient due to the fact that training data for each binary classifier is a subset of the available training data which only contains the data for the two classes involved.…”
Section: B Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 shows the efficiency of the MRMSVM in SVM training which achieved close to 12 times in speedup. Figure 5 shows the efficiency of the MRMSVM in comparison with MRSMO [27] which is one against all based distributed multiclass SVM. MRMSVM is more efficient due to the fact that training data for each binary classifier is a subset of the available training data which only contains the data for the two classes involved.…”
Section: B Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catanzaro et al [41] proposed a parallel SMO algorithm based on MapReduce, but this algorithm is somewhat inefficient because of the iterative nature of SMO. In [42], Alham discussed an efficient and scalable approach based on a single MapReduce phase. They announced that this method has minimal data movement between nodes and that it also minimizes communication overheads.…”
Section: Image Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%