1998
DOI: 10.1007/s002280050394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A distribution study of CYP1A2 phenotypes among smokers and non-smokers in a cohort of healthy Caucasian volunteers

Abstract: The inducing effect of smoking on CYP1A2 activity was confirmed, whereas no significant inhibitory effect of oral contraceptives was observed. The finding that the data are compatible with bimodal distributions in non-smokers suggests a significant impact of genetic factors on MRc. Among smokers, data were also compatible with bimodal distributions, i.e. with the existence of a "non-responder" phenotype concerning CYP1A2 induction by compounds present in tobacco smoke.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
51
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many schizophrenic patients are smokers. Among smokers, CYP1A2 MR shows a trend toward a bimodal distribution (i.e., with the existence of a "nonresponder" phenotype concerning CYP1A2 induction by compounds present in tobacco smoke) in both white persons and Asians (Nakajima et al, 1994;Schrenk et al, 1998). The Ϫ164CϾA SNP has been suggested to be associated with higher enzyme inducibility in white smokers (Sachse et al, 1999) and the Ϫ3858GϾA (CYP1A2*1C) with decreased enzyme inducibility in Japanese smokers (Nakajima et al, 1999).…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many schizophrenic patients are smokers. Among smokers, CYP1A2 MR shows a trend toward a bimodal distribution (i.e., with the existence of a "nonresponder" phenotype concerning CYP1A2 induction by compounds present in tobacco smoke) in both white persons and Asians (Nakajima et al, 1994;Schrenk et al, 1998). The Ϫ164CϾA SNP has been suggested to be associated with higher enzyme inducibility in white smokers (Sachse et al, 1999) and the Ϫ3858GϾA (CYP1A2*1C) with decreased enzyme inducibility in Japanese smokers (Nakajima et al, 1999).…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, smoking cause alterations of pharmacokinetics and drug interactions (Kroon 2007;Li and Shi 2015;Smith 2009). This has been primarily related to induction of liver detoxifying enzymes, including cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 1A1, CYP1B1, CYP1A2, CYP2B6 and glutathione S-transferases, by cigarette smoke chemicals (Chang et al 2003;Eke and Iscan 2002;Schrenk et al 1998;Washio et al 2011). This results in increased metabolism of drugs like imipramine, meprobamate, oestrogens, pentazocine, phenylbutazone, theophylline and warfarin (Miller 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elevated levels of these enzymes, resulting either from a genetic polymorphism or from exposure to an inducer, i.e., an AHR ligand, might predispose individuals to cancer. Interindividual differences in CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 activity have been previously reported in several studies (Butler et al 1992;Smart and Daly 2000;Schrenk et al 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%