2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.106968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A DoE-based approach for the implementation of structural surrogate models in the early stage design of box-wing aircraft

Abstract: One of the possible ways to face the challenge of reducing the environmental impact of aviation, without limiting the growth of air transport, is the introduction of more efficient, radically different aircraft architectures. Among these, the box-wing one represents a promising solution, at least in the case of its application to short-to-medium haul aircraft, which, according to the achievement of the H2020 project "PARSIFAL", would bring to a 20% reduction in terms of emitted CO2 per passengerkilometre. The … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To compute structural and system weight, the tool FLOPS developed by NASA has been used [60]: According to [60], structural weight includes wings, tails, fuselage, nacelle and paint; system weight considers control surfaces actuators, instruments, avionics, anti-icing and furnishing. It is worth noting that the classical model for cantilever wings overestimates the structural mass of the box-wing architecture [75][76][77][78], so the results reported in this paper (e.g., estimation of MTOW) are conservative. This tool is versatile since it can be used for aircraft ranging from general aviation to transport aircraft categories; in this paper, the general aviation category has been selected, since the weight formulation, adopted in this paper and described in FLOPS, have been specifically derived for general aviation aircraft category.…”
Section: Weight Estimationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To compute structural and system weight, the tool FLOPS developed by NASA has been used [60]: According to [60], structural weight includes wings, tails, fuselage, nacelle and paint; system weight considers control surfaces actuators, instruments, avionics, anti-icing and furnishing. It is worth noting that the classical model for cantilever wings overestimates the structural mass of the box-wing architecture [75][76][77][78], so the results reported in this paper (e.g., estimation of MTOW) are conservative. This tool is versatile since it can be used for aircraft ranging from general aviation to transport aircraft categories; in this paper, the general aviation category has been selected, since the weight formulation, adopted in this paper and described in FLOPS, have been specifically derived for general aviation aircraft category.…”
Section: Weight Estimationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The main constraint resulting from the choice to retrofit a baseline aircraft is imposed on the MTOW. Since the main structure of the lifting system and of the fuselage was sized considering the maximum take-off weight calculated in PARSIFAL [47], it is necessary to maintain the same limit on the maximum take-off weight also in this study.…”
Section: Mission Analyses 261 Reference Aircraft and Lh 2 Aircraft De...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main constraint resulting from the choice to retrofit a baseline aircraft is imposed on the MTOW. Since the main structure of the lifting system and of the fuselage has been sized considering the maximum take-off weight calculated in PARSIFAL [47], it is necessary to maintain the same limit on the maximum take-off weight also in this study.…”
Section: Preprintsmentioning
confidence: 99%