2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dose-dependent beneficial effect of methotrexate on the risk of interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Abstract: Objectives The aim of the study was to assess the influence of different factors, including treatment, on the risk of ILD in the course of RA. Methods A total of 109 RA patients were included in the analysis. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of chest was obtained in each patient. Patients were classified as having ILD (ILD group) or not (N-ILD group). The ILD was graded using the semi-quantitative Warrick scale of fibrosis. Warrick extent score (WES) and Warrick severity score (WSS) were calculated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, a dose-dependent beneficial effect of MTX on the risk of developing RA-ILD has been demonstrated (77) (Table 3). The Warrick global score (WGS) was significantly lower in patients treated with a MTX dosage ≥ 15 mg/week as compared with patients treated with MTX < 15 mg/week or patients naïve to MTX (77). As exposed earlier, in fact, RA-ILD and MIP are distinct entities, with MTX being causative of MIP but protective against the development of RA and RA-ILD; therefore, the detection of RA-ILD would not necessarily imply the discontinuation of MTX.…”
Section: Mtx and Common Dmardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a dose-dependent beneficial effect of MTX on the risk of developing RA-ILD has been demonstrated (77) (Table 3). The Warrick global score (WGS) was significantly lower in patients treated with a MTX dosage ≥ 15 mg/week as compared with patients treated with MTX < 15 mg/week or patients naïve to MTX (77). As exposed earlier, in fact, RA-ILD and MIP are distinct entities, with MTX being causative of MIP but protective against the development of RA and RA-ILD; therefore, the detection of RA-ILD would not necessarily imply the discontinuation of MTX.…”
Section: Mtx and Common Dmardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this cohort higher rates of RA-ILD were found in those who had never taken MTX (4.8%) compared with those who had (2.5%), and MTX use was associated with a longer time to the development of ILD. Several other studies have further supported these findings [ 38 41 ]; therefore, MTX should no longer be routinely discontinued in the rheumatoid patient with well-controlled joint disease who develops ILD.…”
Section: Rheumatoid Arthritismentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In the pre-antifibrotic era, immunosuppression was long considered the cornerstone of CTD-ILD treatment with two main purposes: ILD-onset prevention and the deceleration of ILD progression once existent. In RA, an historical debate about the role of methotrexate (MTX), which is considered to be highly effective for articular involvement but with potential lung toxicity, has been reappraised based on large data documenting a beneficial effect of MTX in preventing RA-ILD [144], reducing RA-ILD progression [145], and improving RA-ILD mortality [146]. Similarly, a protective role of abatacept (Aba)-a T-cell-activation inhibitor-and rituximab (RTX)-an anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody-in ILD progression has been postulated.…”
Section: Ctd-ildsmentioning
confidence: 99%