2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dose–response study in animals to evaluate the anticoagulant effect of the stage 2 unfractionated heparin USP monograph change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Utilization of purified reagents, including factor IIa, factor Xa, and specific polypeptide-based chromogenic substrates, in the assay allows the measurement of specific effects from heparin, avoiding the potential for interference from plasma proteins or the presence of OSCS (Supplementary Note 5 and Supplementary Table 2). Over the past 30 years, there has been a 10% drift in potency definition between USP unit and international unit (IU) due to the improved quality of reference materials and potency assay changes 32 . The employment of the new potency assay and new USP Heparin Sodium for Assays reference standard aligned both units, and brought minimum potency requirements in line with expectations for modern heparin products.…”
Section: Methods Establishing Heparin Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilization of purified reagents, including factor IIa, factor Xa, and specific polypeptide-based chromogenic substrates, in the assay allows the measurement of specific effects from heparin, avoiding the potential for interference from plasma proteins or the presence of OSCS (Supplementary Note 5 and Supplementary Table 2). Over the past 30 years, there has been a 10% drift in potency definition between USP unit and international unit (IU) due to the improved quality of reference materials and potency assay changes 32 . The employment of the new potency assay and new USP Heparin Sodium for Assays reference standard aligned both units, and brought minimum potency requirements in line with expectations for modern heparin products.…”
Section: Methods Establishing Heparin Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“….it is essential that health care professionals be aware of the potential difference in potency between the old and new vials of heparin when administering the drug," because the new UFH has a 10% decrease in potency (3). This decrease in heparin potency was suggested to have minimal to no effect, unless administered through an intravenous bolus or when immediate anticoagulation is needed, both of which pertain to operating room procedures (1)(2)(3)(4)(5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusion was that there was a modest reduction in the anticoagulant response with the new heparin. The author noted that the variability of the animal's response to heparin demonstrates the importance of monitoring the heparin effect (7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%