2004
DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v5i4.1981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dose‐volume‐based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans

Abstract: External beam radiotherapy is commonly used for patients with cancer. While tumor shrinkage and palliation are frequently achieved, local control and cure remain elusive for many cancers. With regard to local control, the fundamental problem is that radiotherapy‐induced normal tissue injury limits the dose that can be delivered to the tumor. While intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) allows for the delivery of higher tumor doses and the sparing of proximal critical structures, multiple competing plans … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Miften et al .,[ 8 ] have demonstrated the use of target conformity index (TCI) and normal tissue-sparing index (NTSI) to assist in the process of judging the merit of a clinical treatment plan. But, in this work, the widely accepted conformity index was used to evaluate the conformity of the treatment plans.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miften et al .,[ 8 ] have demonstrated the use of target conformity index (TCI) and normal tissue-sparing index (NTSI) to assist in the process of judging the merit of a clinical treatment plan. But, in this work, the widely accepted conformity index was used to evaluate the conformity of the treatment plans.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is suggested 8 that the optimization and evaluation of radiation treatment plans should be directly based on biological indices rather than physical dose parameters. Several publications [9][10][11] have discussed the application of biological tools to evaluate and rank complex treatment plans. Most commercial TPS (Elekta Monaco, Varian Eclipse and Phillips Pinnacle etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 The main difference of the Marsden Model 1 is that it explicitly incorporates inter patient variation of radio-sensitivities by assuming a normal distribution amongst patient population with a standard deviation. 14 Poisson Model 9 : Assumed cell survival from radiation dose D i in independent subvolume v i following Poisson distributions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterize degree of dose conformity, a number of indices (commonly referred to as conformity indices) have been suggested (e.g., see Refs. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]). In general, in order to compute each of these indices, four quantities are employed: Conformity index (CI) in radiotherapy is frequently computed by using expression recommended by Shaw et al 5,6 :…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%