1999
DOI: 10.1177/00912709922007534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled, Ascending‐Dose Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Modafinil Tablets in Healthy Male Volunteers

Abstract: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of increasing modafinil doses (200 mg, 400 mg, 600 mg, 800 mg) administered orally over a 7-day period in normal healthy male volunteers. Eight subjects (six modafinil; two placebo) were randomized to each of the four dose groups. Modafinil or a placebo was administered once daily for 7 days. Serial blood samples were obtained following administration of the day 1 and day 7 dos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
100
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
10
100
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Modafinil modulates the activity of CNS catecholamine transporters, which are established sites through which many of cocaine-related effects are mediated, so it is possible that this feature played a role in altering cocaine self-administration. Consistent with such a mechanism, modafinil is well absorbed after oral administration and has a terminal elimination half-life of approximately 12-15 h (Wong et al, 1999), whereas the half-life for cocaine is only about 1 h. In addition, modafinil inhibits the firing of midbrain dopamine neurons, possibly through D 2 autoreceptors (Korotkova et al, 2007). Thus, in the current study, it is conceivable that modafinil dampened the ability of the sampled dose of cocaine to acutely increase catecholamine transmission, and thereby reduced the perceived potency and subsequent choice to self-administer the drug.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Modafinil modulates the activity of CNS catecholamine transporters, which are established sites through which many of cocaine-related effects are mediated, so it is possible that this feature played a role in altering cocaine self-administration. Consistent with such a mechanism, modafinil is well absorbed after oral administration and has a terminal elimination half-life of approximately 12-15 h (Wong et al, 1999), whereas the half-life for cocaine is only about 1 h. In addition, modafinil inhibits the firing of midbrain dopamine neurons, possibly through D 2 autoreceptors (Korotkova et al, 2007). Thus, in the current study, it is conceivable that modafinil dampened the ability of the sampled dose of cocaine to acutely increase catecholamine transmission, and thereby reduced the perceived potency and subsequent choice to self-administer the drug.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…injection of modafinil of 150 mg/kg (Ishizuka et al, 2003) elevated neuronal responsiveness in the dentate gyrus to 175% for PS amplitude and 75% for the fEPSP slope, compared to the baseline, pre-injection period. Importantly, the time course of the observed changes is congruent with the rate of modafinil absorption (Wong et al, 1999a;Wong et al, 1999b).…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The drug preparations were delivered for a total of 16 consecutive days, commencing 7 days before the first water-maze trial, and continuing until the end of the watermaze protocol. The target doses were 10 mg/kg and 64 mg/kg, which reflect concentrations of low-end effective dose and a high dose, respectively, for humans (Wong et al, 1999b). The testing on the water-maze began 7 days following the start of drug treatment.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…33 The half-life of R-modafi nil is three times longer than that of S-modafinil (14 hours versus 3-4 hours, respectively). [34][35][36] Patients receiving chronic treatment with racemic modafi nil have threefold higher circulating levels of R-modafi nil than of S-modafi nil. 34,35 The prolonged circulation of R-modafi nil may mean that the majority of effects attributed to modafi nil are due to R-modafi nil; this hypothesis resulted in further investigation of R-modafi nil (armodafi nil) in patients with a variety of disorders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%