2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.01.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A double-distribution-function lattice Boltzmann model for high-speed compressible viscous flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of discrete velocities of the standard lattices is too low to reproduce all the moments required for obtaining the full compressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier (NSF) equations [11]. Increasing the number of discrete velocities and using high-order (multispeed) lattice models is a systematic approach to circumvent these limitations and simulate high-speed compressible flows [12][13][14][15]. However, apart from increased computational cost, a limited temperature range is another restriction of high-order lattices [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of discrete velocities of the standard lattices is too low to reproduce all the moments required for obtaining the full compressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier (NSF) equations [11]. Increasing the number of discrete velocities and using high-order (multispeed) lattice models is a systematic approach to circumvent these limitations and simulate high-speed compressible flows [12][13][14][15]. However, apart from increased computational cost, a limited temperature range is another restriction of high-order lattices [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons with experimental data have been made and the dependences of the average Nusselt number on the Rayleigh number have been established. Qiu et al (2018) considered DDF approach for modeling intensive flows of high velocities. For this purpose, the authors have used a non-standard cell D2Q17 and shown an efficiency and higher accuracy compared to the classical DDF approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19,[21][22][23] ), or building a synthetic collision model that explicitly enforces some constrains (usually solving a nonlinear problem at every grid point and time step), e.g. 11,12,[14][15][16]20,29,30 . It is worth noting that in the former case, many authors refer to conservativity error as Galilean invariance error or symmetry-breaking errors, since the error scales as a power of the velocity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%