2009
DOI: 10.1177/1059601109350985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Double-Edged Sword? Exploring the Curvilinear Relationship Between Organizational Tenure Diversity and Team Innovation: The Moderating Role of Team-Oriented HR Practices

Abstract: Although team diversity facilitates team innovation, research on the relationship between organizational tenure diversity and team innovation has produced mixed findings. To reconcile these inconsistent past findings, the present study is designed to investigate the possible curvilinear relationship between organizational tenure diversity and team innovation, and the moderating effect of team-oriented HR practices. We collect data from 67 R&D teams, including 321 engineers, for our sample, and hierarchical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
150
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(141 reference statements)
7
150
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, organic structures characterized by decentralization and informal rules and procedures tend to promote greater flexibility (Krohmer, Homburg, & Workman, 2002), while inflexibility is true of the opposite , that is, centralization, bureaucracy and formalization is suggested to impede organizational flexibility (Hughes, Hughes, & Morgan, 2010). In the emerging economy context, centralization is inherent in business practice (Tsai et al, 2006) with lower-levels of management given minimal autonomy for decision-making (Chi, Huang, & Lin, 2009). However, managerial discretion-a manager's latitude of action-varies between executives (Li & Tang, 2010), thus centralized structures may still enable organizational flexibility.…”
Section: Organizational Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, organic structures characterized by decentralization and informal rules and procedures tend to promote greater flexibility (Krohmer, Homburg, & Workman, 2002), while inflexibility is true of the opposite , that is, centralization, bureaucracy and formalization is suggested to impede organizational flexibility (Hughes, Hughes, & Morgan, 2010). In the emerging economy context, centralization is inherent in business practice (Tsai et al, 2006) with lower-levels of management given minimal autonomy for decision-making (Chi, Huang, & Lin, 2009). However, managerial discretion-a manager's latitude of action-varies between executives (Li & Tang, 2010), thus centralized structures may still enable organizational flexibility.…”
Section: Organizational Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with explicit knowledge, tacit knowledge can provide organizations with a competitive advantage which cannot be easily imitated by rivals when managed effectively (Nonaka, 1994;Thomas, 2002). Understanding the relationship between knowledge sharing and team innovation is particularly important as teams are often the mechanism through which organizations hope to achieve innovation (Chi, Huang, & Lin, 2009;West, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Roberson and Park (2007) explore how diversity reputation and minority leadership impact firms' performance; Stewart and Johnson (2009) discuss how the quality of leader-member interactions moderates the relationship between gender diversity and team performance; Chi, Huang and Lin (2009) show how HRM is an intermediate factor in the relationship between tenure diversity and innovation; and so forth. However, the definition of diversity and diversity policy is an interesting research topic by and of itself (Van Ewijk, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%