2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-63576-1.50103-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Drilling Scheduling Toolbox for Oil and Gas Reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He also reported high computational costs despite ignoring surface network connections and changes. In a recent study, we showed that an advanced optimization-based approach can outperform a predefined drilling list.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He also reported high computational costs despite ignoring surface network connections and changes. In a recent study, we showed that an advanced optimization-based approach can outperform a predefined drilling list.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the number of new target well sites and existing wells usually exceeds the number of available drilling rigs; thus increasing the complexity of the operation. 59 This necessitates the determination of optimal rig-to-well allocation, rig routing and scheduling (collectively described as workover rig scheduling -WRS). Although geared towards production optimisation, this aspect of drilling has received considerable attention from Tavallali et al 60 and Gupta and Grossmann 61 .…”
Section: Drilling Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Güyagüler proposed the sequencing of the drillings from this queue only when the option becomes active. In contrast, Tavallali et al used a more holistic approach that determined the optimal sequence and timings of the drillings without waiting for the myopic queueing option to become active. As expected, this gave improved results. Most use a given list of well candidates; this could easily miss the best location …”
Section: Oil‐field Designmentioning
confidence: 99%