2012
DOI: 10.1017/s1041610211002560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A driving cessation program to identify and improve transport and lifestyle issues of older retired and retiring drivers

Abstract: Participation in UQDRIVE had a positive and significant effect on the issues of the participants. The results highlight that although all participants stated issues related predominantly to practical concerns, there were trends in the issues identified by the drivers and retired drivers that were consistent with their current phase of the driving cessation process.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While peer leaders may be involved in transport training and driving cessation programmes (see, for example, Molnar et al, 2007), no formal exploration of the experiences of peer leaders within these programmes has been conducted. UQDRIVE is a relatively new programme and, although outcomes for participants have been reported (Gustafsson et al, 2011(Gustafsson et al, , 2012Liddle et al, 2014), the experiences of peer leaders have not been examined. Therefore, this paper intends to address these gaps by examining the experiences of peer leaders in a driving cessation programme.…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While peer leaders may be involved in transport training and driving cessation programmes (see, for example, Molnar et al, 2007), no formal exploration of the experiences of peer leaders within these programmes has been conducted. UQDRIVE is a relatively new programme and, although outcomes for participants have been reported (Gustafsson et al, 2011(Gustafsson et al, , 2012Liddle et al, 2014), the experiences of peer leaders have not been examined. Therefore, this paper intends to address these gaps by examining the experiences of peer leaders in a driving cessation programme.…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual goals set at the beginning of the programme were used in tailoring the intervention. Various educational strategies used in the programme included peer leaders, information sharing, exercises, group discussion, as well as practical community outings (Liddle et al, 2007), with proven efficacy of the intervention demonstrated (Gustafsson et al, 2012;Liddle et al, 2013).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of CarFreeMe has been systematically explored with a general older adult population in a randomized controlled trial (Liddle et al, 2013b). Improvement in community mobility outcomes, self-efficacy (Liddle et al, 2013b), individualized transport and lifestyle goals (Liddle, Hayes, Gustafsson & Fleming, 2014) and high levels of satisfaction (Gustafsson et al, 2012) have been reported by participants. While CarFreeMe was developed for older people without cognitive impairment, there is a clear need for such an intervention to support people living with dementia and their family members.…”
Section: Driving Cessation Intervention For Older Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcome measures included socio demographic questions; geriatric depression scale (GDS; Yesavage et al, 1982); geriatric anxiety index (GAI; Pachana et al, 2007), and a modified version of the Canadian Occupation (COPM) was used to focus goals on transport and lifestyle considerations as used in the original program trial (Gustafsson et al, 2012). The GDS consists of 30 dichotomous (yes/no) items measuring depressive symptoms across the previous week, higher scores indicate more symptoms.…”
Section: Measurement Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%